Archive for the ‘Health News’ Category

Baby born with HIV ‘cured’

Monday, March 4th, 2013

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/

A baby girl who was born with HIV has been cured after very early treatment with standard drug therapy, US researchers have said, in a potentially ground-breaking case that could offer insights on how to eradicate HIV infection in its youngest victims.

The child’s story is the first account of an infant achieving a so-called functional cure, a rare event in which a person achieves remission without the need for drugs and standard blood tests show no signs that the virus is making copies of itself.

More testing needs to be done to see if the treatment would have the same effect on other children, but the results could change the way high-risk babies are treated and possibly lead to a cure for children with HIV, the virus that causes AIDS.

“This is a proof of concept that HIV can be potentially curable in infants,” said Dr Deborah Persaud, a virologist at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, who presented the findings at the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections in Atlanta.

The child’s story differs from the now famous case of Timothy Ray Brown, the so-called “Berlin patient,” whose HIV infection was completely eradicated through an elaborate treatment for leukemia in 2007 that involved the destruction of his immune system and a stem cell transplant from a donor with a rare genetic mutation that resists HIV infection.

Instead of Brown’s costly treatment, the Mississippi baby’s case involved the use of a cocktail of widely available drugs already used to treat HIV infection in infants.

When the baby girl was born in a rural hospital, her mother had just tested positive for HIV infection. Because her mother had not received any prenatal HIV treatment, doctors knew the child was born at high risk of being infected. So they transferred the baby to the University of Mississippi Medical Center in Jackson, where she came under the care of Dr Hannah Gay, a pediatric HIV specialist.

Because of her high infection risk, Dr Gay put the infant on a cocktail of three standard HIV-fighting drugs when she was just 30 hours old, even before lab tests came back confirming her infection. In more typical pregnancies when an HIV-infected mother has been given drugs to reduce the risk of transmission to her child, the baby would only have been given a single drug to reduce her infection risk.

Researchers believe this early use of antiviral treatment likely resulted in the infant’s cure by keeping the virus from forming hard-to-treat pools of cells known as viral reservoirs, which lie dormant and out of the reach of standard medications. These reservoirs rekindle HIV infection in patients who stop therapy, and they are the reason most HIV-infected individuals need lifelong treatment to keep the infection at bay.

After starting on treatment, the baby’s immune system responded and tests showed levels of the virus were diminishing until it was undetectable 29 days after birth.


Like GCN Live on Facebook and follow on Twitter for more great news, opinions, and announcements from GCN Live’s hosts and staff.

Barb Adams: Mind Melds and Brain Nets

Friday, March 1st, 2013

Barb Adams
GCN Live.com

Have scientists taken the first steps towards creating an “organic computer” using real-life brain-to-brain interfaces?.

An article published in Scientific Reports Thursday detailed the results of a research study which “enabled a real-time transfer of behaviorally meaningful sensorimotor information between the brains of two rats” located in two different countries, Brazil and the U.S. During the brain-to-brain interface (BTBI), one “encoder rat” located in a lab in Brazil performed “tasks that required it to select from two choices of tactile or visual stimuli.” Using electronic sensors attached to the encoder rat, “samples of its cortical (brain) activity were transmitted to matching cortical areas of a ‘decoder’ rat’ (located in the U.S.) using intracortical micro stimulation (ICMS).”

What all of this means is that the scientists were able to link the brains of two rats and have them perform as one unit, basically creating “a new central nervous system made of two brains,” says lead researcher Miguel Nicolelis, a neuroscientist at Duke University. The results: a mind meld where the thoughts of one rat guided the other rat to mimic its behaviors.

But unlike a Star Trek Vulcan mind meld, which used telepathy http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Telepathyto link two individuals allowing them to “be of one mind” and share thoughts, Nicolelis says “this system allows one rat to use the senses of another…it’s not telepathy. It’s not the Borg.”

So what are the implications of direct brain-to-brain communication? Nicolelis says it’s “the first step towards constructing an organic computer that uses networks of linked animal brains to solve tasks.” He believes the results show how BTBIs could be used to “exchange, process, and store information,” thus serving “as the basis for studies of novel types of social interaction and for biological computing devices.”

It’s the “novel types of social interaction” part that Nicolelis mentions that may be of concern, however. It wouldn’t be too hard to imagine armies of animal or human soldiers all controlled by others. Interestingly, $26 million dollars in funding for Nicolelis’s research comes from the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) “for work on brain-machine interfaces.”

While the idea of creating computing devices that can “think” on their own is nothing new, the research is a step towards creating what the researchers call a “brain net,” where animals’ brains are linked together to create a network. Duke researchers are currently attempting “to link four rats’ brains,” and Nicolelis is conducting research studies involving mind-to-mind communication between monkeys (nonhuman primates). Will these experiments eventually lead to the creation of a human brain net?

According to the article by Reuters, “Mind Melds Move from Science Fiction to Science in Rats,” Nicolelis was quoted as saying, “I wouldn’t mind if, 100 years from now, people say two rats started human brain nets.” Can someone say “cheese?”

So how close are researchers to achieving fully operational brain-machine interfaces? According to the Reuters article, Bioengineer Douglas Weber of Pittsburgh says that “It’s cool that the stimulus came from another brain rather than an electrical device, but many labs have shown that animals can detect electrical stimuli delivered to the brain. This paper simply shows that the animals can detect electrical stimuli…from another rat’s brain. There is nothing unexpected or surprising.”

However, “Neurobiologist Andrew Schwartz, of the University of Pittsburgh, a leader in the field of brain-computer interactions, said that ‘from a scientific/engineering point of view, this is of limited interest.’ Brain-machine interfaces ‘have moved far beyond this.’” How “far beyond” does Schwartz mean? Are researchers already using our natural telepathic abilities for purposes of brain-machine interfaces, and are we actually close to true mind melds?

Let’s hope the saying “two heads are better than one” doesn’t set the stage for our future, where we’re all linked together in one giant brain net or mind meld. There’s something to be said for diversity and individual thought.


talk radio hostBarb Adams is the host of Amerika Now talk radio show, which airs on GCN Saturdays 10:00p-1:00am Central Time. Listen to the show On Demand.

Like GCN Live on Facebook and follow on Twitter for more great news, opinions, and announcements from GCN Live’s hosts and staff.

Mediterranean Diet Shown to Ward Off Heart Attack and Stroke

Thursday, February 28th, 2013

By GINA KOLATA
http://www.nytimes.com/

About 30 percent of heart attacks, strokes and deaths from heart disease can be prevented in people at high risk if they switch to a Mediterranean diet rich in olive oil, nuts, beans, fish, fruits and vegetables, and even drink wine with meals, a large and rigorous new study has found.

The findings, published on The New England Journal of Medicine’s Web site on Monday, were based on the first major clinical trial to measure the diet’s effect on heart risks. The magnitude of the diet’s benefits startled experts. The study ended early, after almost five years, because the results were so clear it was considered unethical to continue.

The diet helped those following it even though they did not lose weight and most of them were already taking statins, or blood pressure or diabetes drugs to lower their heart disease risk.

“Really impressive,” said Rachel Johnson, a professor of nutrition at the University of Vermont and a spokeswoman for the American Heart Association. “And the really important thing — the coolest thing — is that they used very meaningful endpoints. They did not look at risk factors like cholesterol or hypertension or weight. They looked at heart attacks and strokes and death. At the end of the day, that is what really matters.”

Until now, evidence that the Mediterranean diet reduced the risk of heart disease was weak, based mostly on studies showing that people from Mediterranean countries seemed to have lower rates of heart disease — a pattern that could have been attributed to factors other than diet.

And some experts had been skeptical that the effect of diet could be detected, if it existed at all, because so many people are already taking powerful drugs to reduce heart disease risk, while other experts hesitated to recommend the diet to people who already had weight problems, since oils and nuts have a lot of calories.

Heart disease experts said the study was a triumph because it showed that a diet was powerful in reducing heart disease risk, and it did so using the most rigorous methods. Scientists randomly assigned 7,447 people in Spain who were overweight, were smokers, or had diabetes or other risk factors for heart disease to follow the Mediterranean diet or a low-fat one.

Low-fat diets have not been shown in any rigorous way to be helpful, and they are also very hard for patients to maintain — a reality borne out in the new study, said Dr. Steven E. Nissen, chairman of the department of cardiovascular medicine at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation.

“Now along comes this group and does a gigantic study in Spain that says you can eat a nicely balanced diet with fruits and vegetables and olive oil and lower heart disease by 30 percent,” he said. “And you can actually enjoy life.”

The study, by Dr. Ramon Estruch, a professor of medicine at the University of Barcelona, and his colleagues, was long in the planning. The investigators traveled the world, seeking advice on how best to answer the question of whether a diet alone could make a big difference in heart disease risk. They visited the Harvard School of Public Health several times to consult Dr. Frank M. Sacks, a professor of cardiovascular disease prevention there.

In the end, they decided to randomly assign subjects at high risk of heart disease to three groups. One would be given a low-fat diet and counseled on how to follow it. The other two groups would be counseled to follow a Mediterranean diet. At first the Mediterranean dieters got more intense support. They met regularly with dietitians while members of the low-fat group just got an initial visit to train them in how to adhere to the diet, followed by a leaflet each year on the diet. Then the researchers decided to add more intensive counseling for them, too, but they still had difficulty staying with the diet.

One group assigned to a Mediterranean diet was given extra-virgin olive oil each week and was instructed to use at least 4 four tablespoons a day. The other group got a combination of walnuts, almonds and hazelnuts and was instructed to eat about an ounce of the mix each day. An ounce of walnuts, for example, is about a quarter cup — a generous handful. The mainstays of the diet consisted of at least three servings a day of fruits and at least two servings of vegetables. Participants were to eat fish at least three times a week and legumes, which include beans, peas and lentils, at least three times a week. They were to eat white meat instead of red, and, for those accustomed to drinking, to have at least seven glasses of wine a week with meals.

They were encouraged to avoid commercially made cookies, cakes and pastries and to limit their consumption of dairy products and processed meats.

To assess compliance with the Mediterranean diet, researchers measured levels of a marker in urine of olive oil consumption — hydroxytyrosol — and a blood marker of nut consumption — alpha-linolenic acid.

The participants stayed with the Mediterranean diet, the investigators reported. But those assigned to a low-fat diet did not lower their fat intake very much. So the study wound up comparing the usual modern diet, with its regular consumption of red meat, sodas and commercial baked goods, with a diet that shunned all that.

Dr. Estruch said he thought the effect of the Mediterranean diet was due to the entire package, not just the olive oil or nuts. He did not expect, though, to see such a big effect so soon. “This is actually really surprising to us,” he said.

The researchers were careful to say in their paper that while the diet clearly reduced heart disease for those at high risk for it, more research was needed to establish its benefits for people at low risk. But Dr. Estruch said he expected it would also help people at both high and low risk, and suggested that the best way to use it for protection would be to start in childhood.

Not everyone is convinced, though. Dr. Caldwell Blakeman Esselstyn Jr., the author of the best seller “Prevent and Reverse Heart Disease: The Revolutionary, Scientifically Proven, Nutrition-Based Cure,” who promotes a vegan diet and does not allow olive oil, dismissed the study.

His views and those of another promoter of a very-low-fat diet, Dr. Dean Ornish, president of the nonprofit Preventive Medicine Research Institute, have influenced many to try to become vegan. Former President Bill Clinton, interviewed on CNN, said Dr. Esselstyn’s and Dr. Ornish’s writings helped convince him that he could reverse his heart disease in that way.

Dr. Esselstyn said those in the Mediterranean diet study still had heart attacks and strokes. So, he said, all the study showed was that “the Mediterranean diet and the horrible control diet were able to create disease in people who otherwise did not have it.”

Others hailed the study.

“This group is to be congratulated for carrying out a study that is nearly impossible to do well,” said Dr. Robert H. Eckel, a professor of medicine at the University of Colorado and a past president of the American Heart Association.

As for the researchers, they have changed their own diets and are following a Mediterranean one, Dr. Estruch said.

“We have all learned,” he said.


Like GCN Live on Facebook and follow on Twitter for more great news, opinions, and announcements from GCN Live’s hosts and staff.

Explosive Report: 98% of Newborn Babies are Genetically Screened

Wednesday, February 27th, 2013

Jon Rappoport
GCN Live.com
February 27, 2013

“Newborn Screening in America,” a report from the Council for Responsible Genetics, states: “Before they are even a week old, ninety-eight percent of the 4.3 million babies born annually in the United States have a small sample of blood taken from their heels.”

Council for Responsible Genetics report states: “Newborn bloodspots (NBS) are then screened for a variety of inherited conditions and may later be stored in state-operated databases…parents are often unaware of these screening programs and their consent options.”

The report continues: “These newborn bloodspots (NBS) are then screened for a variety of inherited conditions and may later be stored in state-operated databases…parents are often unaware of these screening programs and their consent options.”

This shocking national program, flying under the radar, is of course explained as a humane medical undertaking. But there is no across-the-board genetic treatment for any disease or illness. All the “maybe-possibly-in-the-future-cure” nonsense does nothing to justify this rank incursion on newborns and their unsuspecting families.

The report goes on: “With respect to [bloodspot] sample storage and use, there is also little transparency regarding storage procedures or the use of the samples after they have been screened…many states do not have clearly articulated policies about consent for the storage and use of samples or may not effectively communicate these policies to parents.”

Then there is the question of who now has, or will have in the future, access to all these millions of blood samples and the results of the genetic screening.

Reliable and trustworthy assurances of citizen-privacy from the government have gone the way of the dinosaur and other extinct species.

Let’s see…DNA samples of nearly every newborn baby in America: surveillance and tracking, anyone? We have here the makings of a universal DNA database for “crime prevention.”

Controversial legislation introduced to obtain a DNA sample from every adult? It’s already being done covertly in hospitals, at birth.

What about technocrats obsessed with re-engineering humans? What about other researchers who want to run comparative DNA studies in thousands of different ways, for any purpose under the sun—who for example are intensely interested in making (or inventing) genetic distinctions between various socioeconomic sectors of society? This newborn database is irresistible.

You can be sure social, medical, and genetic engineers are looking at all this raw data like wild animals look at prey on the plains.

The idea of correlating genetic factors with “failure in life” is the Holy Grail for eugenicists. They will find a way to gain access to the data, because they want to build “a better world” and eliminate the “inferior” people.

Right now, we have rapid abortionists who earnestly believe and advocate the destruction of life after birth as a viable option. They even call it abortion. So a doctor could tell a parent, “The genetic profile of your baby is very problematic. You should consider terminating life…”

Again, all this illegal and immoral collection of genetic data from babies is justified as a “humane medical endeavor.” So ask your doctor, “Where is the ironclad proof that you have any genetic treatment for any disease that works across the board?” Don’t accept blue-sky predictions and promises.

Get real.

Because the State is getting real. They want control. And taking blood samples from babies is a giant step on the road to a genetic dictatorship.

Jon Rappoport
The author of an explosive collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com

Florida doesn’t have enough doctors for Medicaid expansion, lobby group says

Monday, February 25th, 2013

By Kathleen Haughney
http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/

TALLAHASSEE Brace yourself for longer lines at the doctor’s office.

Whether you’re employed and insured, elderly and on Medicare, or poor and covered by Medicaid, the Florida Medical Association says there’s a growing shortage of doctors — especially specialists — available to provide you with medical care.

And if the Florida Legislature goes along with Gov. Rick Scott’s recommendation to offer Medicaid coverage to an additional 1 million Floridians — part of the Affordable Care Act that takes effect next January — the FMA says that shortage will only get worse.

“Florida needs more doctors and it needs more nurses, and it needs them working together in teams,” said Rebecca O’Hara, a lobbyist for the FMA.

About 15 million Floridians have health insurance today, and Obamacare, which requires most adults to have coverage by January, could add as many as 2.5 million more. One million would come through a potential expansion of the federal-state Medicaid program that Scott announced this week he was backing. The others would be the result of new mandates requiring employers and individuals to have insurance or be fined.

Currently, the state has 44,804 doctors, but about 5,600 of them are expected to retire in the next five years. And even though Florida has opened three new medical schools in the past dozen years, the state isn’t producing as many doctors as it needs. Scott’s budget this year has $80 million to fund programs to train 700 new residents a year, in hopes they’ll remain in the state.

Of all patients, people covered by Medicaid may have the hardest time finding a doctor; only 59 percent of the state’s physicians are taking new Medicaid patients, according to a Kaiser Health News study.

Committees in both the House and Senate have been meeting for the past two months to discuss implementation of the Affordable Care Act. On March 4, they expect to see two major studies by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research, one that looks at the overall economic impact of the health-care overhaul and another that simply examines Medicaid expansion.

Scott, however, has already made clear how he feels about that.

On Wednesday, he unexpectedly announced that he had reversed his earlier, adamant opposition and now wants a three-year expansion that would cover single adults and families earning up to 138 percent of the poverty line; the costs would be fully covered by the federal government. If the expansion is re-approved after three years, the federal government is committed to paying no less than 90 percent of the cost.

House and Senate leaders will begin their budget deliberations in the coming weeks, which will include the decision over new residency slots, along with the debate over whether to expand Medicaid. Many lawmakers have expressed opposition.

Sen. Joe Negron, R-Stuart, who chairs the Senate committee studying the AFA, said lawmakers have heard concerns about a potential physician shortage, but he said he did not believe that would be a “determining factor” in the committee’s decision over whether to expand Medicaid.

One reason, he said, is the responsibility for coverage may soon be falling to private health insurance companies or physician groups.

The federal government this week gave Florida preliminary approval of a plan that would put most of Florida’s current 3.3 million Medicaid recipients — and any added via expansion — in some form of managed care, either HMOs or doctor-run networks, by 2014. In order for HMOs or the provider service networks to get state-approved contracts, they must prove they can provide “adequate” care, which means patients must be able to see a doctor in a reasonable time.

“It’s their responsibility to have network adequacy,” Negron said of the private providers. “So, they’ll be responsible for making sure people can get care with network physicians.”

Negron also noted that the amount doctors will be paid for seeing Medicaid patients is rising, which may prompt more physicians to take them. As part of the health care law, primary-care doctors will be paid as much for a Medicaid patient as they are under Medicare, a 73 percent increase.

Health care advocates who back the expansion say they aren’t worried either.

Greg Mellowe, policy director for health advocacy group Florida Chain, said the state needed to carefully watch the situation as it develops, but added, “We don’t believe that there is a crisis brewing.”

Mellowe noted that many uninsured already receive care — often in emergency rooms, which is more expensive — that hospitals aren’t paid for. If many of these patients have insurance coverage, he said, hospitals may see an opportunity to shift resources to primary care settings.

Lawmakers are slated to return to Tallahassee the week of March 4 for the beginning of the 2013 legislative session. The studies from the state economists are also due at that time.

Negron said until the state can look at that information, it was impossible to say what direction the Legislature would take.

“It will be a judgment call to make on the right way to proceed for Florida’s families and businesses,” he said. “I just think it’s too early to tell where either the House or Senate will come down on this.”


Like GCN Live on Facebook and follow on Twitter for more great news, opinions, and announcements from GCN Live’s hosts and staff.