Archive for the ‘Health News’ Category

THE CHALLENGES AND CHARMS OF GETTING OLDER!

Friday, May 10th, 2013

by Jim Brown,


Show host,Jim Brown’s Common Sense


I woke up earlier this week, followed my normal routine of walking the dogs, picking up the morning papers, pouring my large glass of orange juice half filled with water to dilute the sugar, checked my emails, walked out on the patio to glance over the news ... and then it dawned on me – I’ve turned 73.


Seventy-three? How did that happen? Not too long ago, I would have said that 73 is really old. And to many, I suppose it is. I don’t think I look 73. Oh, I do look in the mirror from time to time, and see reflections of my father. I remember him well in his 70s. He had suffered his first heart attack by then, and though he did not look real old, still, he had aged a good bit. I look away and from the mirror, and he is a vision of a much younger man. But when I look, back, there he is. When you glance into a mirror, who knows when you will meet a past you hadn’t expected and may be not ready for. I guess one can say that about the future as well. Look into the mirror and tell me what you see… right?

How do I feel? My doctor, whose first name is “Bubba” (you check out closely a doctor named “Bubba”) says I look a heck of a lot better on the outside than I do on the inside. I have my share of aches and pains. A knee that needs a partial replacement, some recurring arthritis, too much hay fever and a sore back. But hey, I had all that 20 years ago. So I guess I’m doin’ OK.

A cute story to share about my age — I’m getting a smoothie some months ago, and the cashier asks my name to put on the ticket. I said “Jim Brown.” The counter girl, all of 17 with a number of piercings and purple streaked hair, prepares my smoothie and calls out “Jim.” She’s a bit young, at least from my perspective, to call a guy my age “Jim.” So I ask her how old she thinks I am. Then I sweeten the question. I tell her if she comes within five years of my age, I’ll give her a five-dollar tip. Remember the smoothie is only $3.50, so I’m making it worth her while to guess right. Of course she wants the large tip. She looks closely, squints her eyes, studies my face, and, after a rather long pause, she announces: “You’re fifty two!” Without blinking an eye, I pulled out a five-dollar bill and gave it to her. “You win,” I said. Actually, I’m he winner if she reflects anything close to a younger prevailing view.

I still listen to the 50s music on the radio and remember, well, dancing in high school to Jerry Lee Lewis — Whole Lotta Shakin’ Goin’ On. In the 60s, I was a Ferriday lawyer representing the likes of Jerry Lee and his cousin Jimmy Swaggart. Three daughters and country living dominated the 70s, and politics took over my life in the 80s and 90s. The Feds were an irritant in the early new century, but I survived and have branched out in a number of new directions. Our visit each week through this column and on the radio is one more reflection of living life to the fullest. Four grandchildren in the past decade is the icing on the cake.

Tolstoy, in boyhood, wrote: “I am convinced that if I should ever live to a ripe old age and my story keeps pace with my age, I shall daydream just as boyishly and impractically as an old man of 70 as I do now.” I once thought I daydreamed too much. But isn’t that what creative people do? Painters, musicians, poets, actors are all full of aspirations and dreams, many out of reach.

I’ve tried to flush out an occasional creative vibe. Painting with a granddaughter, who, at eleven years old, is much better than me. Refreshing my banjo skills. Would you believe that in my twenties, I helped pay my way through law school by strumin’ the banjo at Your Father’s Mustache on Bourbon Street in New Orleans? Even a stint as an actor in the Three Penny Opera and The Fantasticks at several local theatres in the French Quarter. It took a while, but I finally figured out that I shouldn’t worry about being all that skilled at many things. It was better to delight in the pursuit, and find clarity by enjoying the undertaking itself, regardless of my limited talent.

Yes, seventy-three is a milestone. But I won’t consider myself old — just a bit older. Ninety is probably old, but I have many years of lively living before I have to consider that next line in the sand. In the meantime, I will continue to be the happy go lucky, meddling, opinionated, bullheaded, talkaholic, health conscious, lovable (from my perspective) fellow that I have always been. I won’t hesitate to give plenty of advice to my children. They may be middle aged, but they are still my kids, and even though they think they don’t need my advice, I know they really do.

Grandchildren are a bit different. My oldest has learned that by the strategic use of smiles, sighs, pleadings, persistence and kisses, that a firm “no” is quickly turned into a “yes.” And I am awfully good at hide and seek, playing “Marco-Polo in the swimming pool, telling animal and ghost stories at bedtime, teaching shoe tying 101, patching up boo boos, and other similar adolescent attributes.
So why make a big deal of being 73? I mean, it’s just a number isn’t it? Like a bunch of other numbers in your life. Dates, addresses, sums, amounts, and then, in the mix, is age. But maybe it’s more than that. I can make a case that it could be an important milestone. My seventy-three years, by any measures, have been full and hard living, with ups and downs too numerous to mention. If there is a yin and a yang, the before and the after, what has happened, and what is yet to be, then maybe seventy-three is a special waypost for me. Hey, I could be at the top and ready for the long and relaxing ride back down.

As for the rest of all you youngsters below the age of seventy-three, I have just this one thought. It’s nice to be on this side of troubled waters.


Like GCN Live on Facebook and follow on Twitter for more great news, opinions, and announcements from GCN Live’s hosts and staff.

FDA Lowers Age for Buyers of Plan B Pill to 15

Thursday, May 2nd, 2013

By LAURAN NEERGAARD, AP


USNews.com


WASHINGTON (AP) — In a surprise twist to the effort to ease access to morning-after pills, the government has lowered the age limit to 15 for one brand — Plan B One-Step — and will let it be sold over the counter.

Today, Plan B and its generic competition are sold behind pharmacy counters, and people must prove they’re 17 or older to buy the emergency contraception without a prescription. A federal judge had ordered those restrictions to be dropped.

[READ: Judge: Make Morning-After Pill Available to All Females]

But on Tuesday, the Food and Drug Administration approved a different approach: Plan B could sit on drugstore shelves with other women’s health products — but buyers must prove they’re 15 or older at the cash register.

Manufacturer Teva Women’s Health says it plans to make the switch in a few months.


Like GCN Live on Facebook and follow on Twitter for more great news, opinions, and announcements from GCN Live’s hosts and staff.

Montana raw milk bill MOOving to the Senate

Monday, April 15th, 2013

By Kallen Diggs

Montana may just be another state to permit the sale of raw milk. At least half of states allow some form of retail sale of raw milk, whether it’s fully permitted or limited to an extent. The Montana law says “selling raw milk is a misdemeanor that could land a dairy farmer 6 months behind bars and a maximum fine of $500.”.

 

So what is raw milk? Raw milk is milk that hasn’t been pasteurized to kill bacteria and pathogens. These pathogens may include salmonella, e coli, and listeria (all known to be potentially fatal and/or deadly). Today, almost all milk purchased from grocery stores are pasteurized which is labeled on the product’s carton.

Montana’s HB 574 has been moving along and recently passed the House. The bill will legalize the sale of unpasteurized milk directly from unregulated dairies. Some critics oppose the bill and suggest that it is dangerous and needs to be regulated. One of their main concerns are that consumers may get sick from consumption and it is the job of the government to protect the public’s health. One critic, Florida’s Department of Health, stated that “raw milk can be very dangerous to your health as it can harbor numerous disease-causing organisms.” They further state that in a span of one year, “more than 300 people in the United States got sick from drinking raw milk or eating cheese made from raw milk, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.” State Rep, Champ Edmunds (primary sponsor of the bill), understands the concern but stated that “regulation doesn’t eliminate the possibility of people getting sick.”

Supporters of the bill mention the thousands of enzymes and friendly flora bacteria as vital nutrients to one’s health. The supporters argue that pasteurized milk robs the consumer from nutrients that are harder to obtain elsewhere. The National Farmers Union, a major farm group, voiced their support for the bill, stating that “it provides a viable market niche for dairies.”

A lot of center leftists and libertarians side with the bill because it will allow the person to make their own decision about what to put in their body. The bill only holds the consumer liable, stating that the consumer “ assumes inherent risks in consuming milk or milk products that are not pasteurized, whether those risks are known or unknown, and is legally responsible for all injury or death to their person and for all damages to their property that result from the inherent risks in the consumption of raw milk or milk products.” Most liberals and libertarians are fine with the clause since they believe in making their own decisions and accepting the associated risks. They consider themselves “free individuals” and as free individuals they believe in doing as they please as long it does not inflict harm on others.

Although raw milk statistics are harder to track due to its underground nature, the CDC have found that at least 3% of Americans consume raw milk and only 2 people have died from it. Even if the fatality count was 100x higher, it would still be much less than the amount of people that die in car accidents or from taking pharmaceutical drugs.

Governor Steve Bullock hasn’t stated whether he is in favor of the bill or not but 30,000 Montanans are. The Senate Agriculture, Livestock, and Irrigation Committee will have a hearing for HB 574 on Tuesday. While some people are unsure on how they feel about the bill, HB 574 will mandate warning labels on all unpasteurized dairy products for sale. The warning label should provide comfort and serve as a reminder to any potential customer who is considering purchasing raw milk. The choice is theirs and they must live with the consequences (if they are any).

Sources:

Associated Press: Montana Raw Milk Legalization (HR 574)

Dangers of Drinking Raw Milk (Florida Dept of Health)

SF Gate: Montana Raw Milk Bill Moving Ahead

Food Safety News: Two Major Farm Groups Take Opposite Tack On Raw Milk

Food Safety News: Montana’s Raw Milk Bill Big Sky Loopholes

Kallen Diggs is a natural health educator that brings awareness to the public about living healthier lives. Kallen is a Penn State University graduate with a bachelor degree in nutrition. He currently lives in Austin, TX where he petitions for GMO labeling, alternative medicine, and other health freedom laws.


Like GCN Live on Facebook and follow on Twitter for more great news, opinions, and announcements from GCN Live’s hosts and staff.

More Young Adolescents May Be Waiting To Have Sex

Tuesday, April 2nd, 2013

By RTT news

RTTnews.com


Very few young adolescent kids in America are engaging in sex, according to a new study from researchers at the Guttmacher Institute.


The researchers examined data collected from kids aged 10 to 19 as part of the National Survey of Family Growth between 2006 and 2010. The study found that only 0.6 percent of all 10-year-old kids reported engaging in any form of sexual activity. This number grew to only 1.1 percent of 11-year-olds and 2.4 percent of 12-year-olds.

“Policymakers and the media often sensationalize teen sexual behavior, suggesting that adolescents as young as 10 or 11 are increasingly sexually active,” said lead author Lawrence Finer. “But the data just don’t support that concern. Rather, we are seeing teens waiting longer to have sex, using contraceptives more frequently when they start having sex, and being less likely to become pregnant than their peers of past decades.”


Like GCN Live on Facebook and follow on Twitter for more great news, opinions, and announcements from GCN Live’s hosts and staff.

GM salmon rejected by Whole Foods, Trader Joe’s, Aldi and other food retailers

Thursday, March 21st, 2013

Mike Adams
Natural News
March 21, 2013

In yet another blow to GMOs, several major U.S. food retailers have signed on to the “Campaign for GE-Free Seafood” found at http://www.foe.org/gefreeseafood

These retailers include Whole Foods, Trader Joe’s, Aldi and many more. It’s the latest private sector blow to the deceptive biotech industry. Consumers overwhelming reject GMOs even if the FDA conspires with biotechnology companies to try to shove genetically engineered food down their throats. Activist organizations like Natural News, the Organic Consumers Association and the Institute for Responsible Technology have helped organize constant grassroots pressure on food retailers to either label GMOs or reject them outright.

“A coalition of consumer, health, food safety and fishing groups today launched the Campaign for Genetically Engineered (GE)-Free Seafood by announcing that several major grocery retailers representing more than 2,000 stores across the United States have already committed not to sell genetically engineered seafood if it is allowed onto the market,” reads the press release announcement. It continues:

The FDA has stated it will likely not label genetically engineered salmon, providing consumers no way of knowing if the fish they are feeding their families is genetically engineered. At least 35 other species of genetically engineered fish are currently under development, and the FDA’s decision on this genetically engineered salmon application will set a precedent for other genetically engineered fish and animals (including cows, chickens and pigs) to enter the global food market.

Mainstream media tries to downplay the power of grassroots activism against GE foods

What’s interesting about this announcement is that the mainstream media is largely refusing to link to the FOE.org website for fear of readers learning more about the “Friends of the Earth” organization and its GE-Free Seafood petition.

The mainstream media, I can tell you firsthand, has engaged in a longstanding conspiracy to attack GMO labeling, deny the presence of GMOs in food and spread quack science propaganda that favors the biotech industry. But they are losing this battle over GMOs and losing their audiences at the same time. The New York Times, in particular, is an absolute disgrace when it comes to reporting to truth about GMOs, and it’s no surprise the NYT seems constantly on the verge of bankruptcy while being known as the “toilet paper of record.”

Note, too, that the FDA seems determined to hide GMO ingredients in foods as a strategy to make sure consumers have no clue what they’re buying and eating. This campaign of intentional consumer ignorance and disinformation echoes the key underlying philosophy of the FDA and the biotech industry: LIE TO EVERYONE. Hide GMOs. Confuse, deny, obfuscate and disorient. Pollute the ecosystem, poison the fields, falsify the science and rake in the profits. That’s the mantra of the biotech industry.

Thankfully, they’re not getting away with it. This is the second significant announcement by Whole Foods on the issue of GMOs. Just two weeks ago, the retailer announced mandatory GMO labeling across all its stores by 2018.

Natural News will publicly shame retailers still selling unlabeled GMOs by 2018

Whole Foods has no doubt realized that coming down on the wrong side of history with respect to GM food is nothing short of corporate suicide. Trader Joe’s had better wise up as well, because here at Natural News, we pledge that by 2018 or possibly sooner, we will publicly expose the GMOs sold by Whole Foods, Trader Joe’s and other retailers unless they are actively and authentically moving toward labeling and / or eliminating all GMOs from their stores. We support Whole Foods’ effort to label all GMOs by 2018, but if this turns out to be some sort of PR stunt that isn’t followed through in terms of real action, the grassroots activist community will hold them accountable.

There will be transparency on this issue whether the retailers like it or not. Any retailer still selling GMOs by 2018 will be publicly shamed, ridiculed and boycotted by the informed masses of foodies and health-conscious consumers. Sure, all those who pledge GMO labeling say they have chosen to “do the right thing” because they’re all such angels, right? But those of us in the trenches of the info war on the issue of GMOs know the raw, brutal truth of the matter: unless large retailers are pressured into honoring their commitments on GMOs, they may conveniently forget them. My experience with these matters, which is considerable, says that only through the application of grassroots pressure and the constant threat of public humiliation will these retailers make good on their promises to reject or label GMOs.

That’s the ugly but authentic truth of how these things really work behind the scenes. So keep the pressure on, folks, and these retailers will sooner or later be forced to reject GMOs entirely. A victory against Monsanto (i.e. a victory for the future of life on our planet) is within reach. Keep applying pressure and be prepared to continue your activism for as many years as it takes to put Monsanto permanently out of business.