Archive for December, 2011

America’s farmlands to be carpet-bombed with Vietnam-era Agent Orange chemical

Tuesday, December 27th, 2011

Mike Adams
Natural News
December 27, 2011

(NaturalNews) A key chemical of one of the most horrifying elements of the Vietnam War — Agent Orange — may soon be unleashed on America’s farmlands. Considered by world nations to be a “Weapon of Mass Destruction” (WMD), Agent Orange was dropped in the millions of gallons on civilian populations during the Vietnam War in order to destroy foliage and poison North Vietnamese soldiers. The former president of the Vietnamese Red Cross, Professor Nhan, described it as, “…a massive violation of human rights of the civilian population, and a weapon of mass destruction.”

A key chemical in that weapon – 2,4-D – is just months away from being dropped on agricultural land across the United States. Dow AgroSciences, which along with DuPont and Monsanto is heavily invested in genetically engineered crops, has petitioned the U.S. government to deregulate a variety of GE corn that’s resistant to 2,4-D, which comprises 50% of the recipe of Agent Orange.

NaturalNews broke this story yesterday.

If the petition is approved by Washington, it would turn America’s corn fields into chemical warfare zones targeted for mass pesticide poisoning with 2,4-D chemicals. The corn, of course, would be immune to 2,4-D, so it would uptake the chemical and transport it right into the structure of the corn kernels, creating “Agent Orange corn bombs” that would be chemically unleashed when consumed by human beings.

This is just the latest example of how industrial chemical giants and GMO companies of the world are committing acts of genocide against innocents. The introduction of 2,4-D-resistant GE corn is, essentially, an act of war against humanity.

Food crops sprayed with chemical weapons

The use of such chemicals on civilian targets is a violation of the 1907 Hague Convention, the 1927 Geneva Convention, and the 1949 Geneva Convention (http://www.iadllaw.org/en/node/353).

TheInternational Tribunal of Conscience in Support of the Vietnamese Victims of Agent Orangehas published a document briefly describing the war crimes committed by the U.S. government in its use of Agent Orange:http://www.iadllaw.org/files/charge…

That document states:

The chemical warfare waged by the United States against Vietnam though the use of Agent Orange and other dioxin laced chemicals from 1961 to 1971 has caused severe, massive and prolonged consequences for the environment, ecology and health of the people of Vietnam.

See the photos of Agent Orange victims

Shocking pictures of Agent Orange victims can be seen at the following pages (WARNING, extremely graphic):
http://oraclesyndicate.twoday.net/s…

http://www.spingola.com/power_elite…

http://antiwar.com/orig/austin.php?…

http://legacy.bhopal.net/opinions/a…

http://vietnamartwork.wordpress.com…

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/0…

http://thetheologianscafe.xanga.com…

http://www.commondreams.org/headlin…

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3…

Watch the video of children affected by Agent Orange:

Hear the Agent Orange song by Country Joe. Visit:http://countryjoe.com/jukebox.htmand click on “Agent Orange Song” on the top left. You’ll be able to hear the full song.

First Vietnam, now America

Even walking around America today, many Americans are born as mutants thanks to the chemicals used in foods, medicines, lawn care and personal care products. That crime against humanity is about to be made far, far worse with the unleashing of 2,4-D on America’s farmlands.

The gross deformities, birth defects, neurological disorders and physical retardation we have seen in Vietnamese children affected by Agent Orange could soon arrive at America’s doorstep thanks to 2,4-D.

Dow, of course, is widely regarded as one of the most evil corporations on the planet, having already poisoned countless victims with toxic chemicals. Remember the Bhopal pesticide factory explosion in India? That was Union Carbide, owned by Dow. It killed thousands of people, maimed tens of thousands and injured over half a million (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhopal…).

Read more about Bhopal:http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/…

And learn more about Dow here:
http://www.thetruthaboutdow.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dow_Ch…

Remember: If chemical weapons are used to produce food, then those who consume such foods become casualties of war.

Food production was once an honorable art, but at the hands of greed-driven globalists, it quickly became a system of profit seeking and then a tool for corporate domination over the People. Now it has become a weapon of mass destruction, and it is being used to decimate the health of both the population and the farmlands.

Mobile fluoride vans to target communities that voted to remove chemical from public water supply

Tuesday, December 27th, 2011

Ethan A. Huff
Natural News
December 27, 2011

(NaturalNews) Back in October, the Pinellas County, Fla., Commission voted 4 – 3 to stop adding artificial fluoride chemicals to the county’s municipal water supply, which serves roughly 700,000 residents. But now local health officials are suggesting that the county purchase a mobile fluoride van as an alternative, which would drive around town and administer fluoride and other conventional dental services directly to children.

Believe it or not, the St. Petersburg Timesreports that the Pinellas County Commission will soon vote on whether or not to purchase this mobile fluoride van for $532,339 in taxpayer funds, which is more than twice the $205,000 a year the county has been spending to purchase fluoride chemicals for the water supply. The Commission had asked the county’s Health and Human Services department to come up with a new way to use the $205,000 for other dental purposes, and the mobile fluoride van was their proposal.

“There’s no way I’m going to support a $532,000 item,” said Commissioner John Morroni, who was one of the members who voted in favor of ending water fluoridation. “You can buy a lot of toothpaste and help the dentists disburse it.”

Morroni is right, of course — if the county is persistent in making sure as many children as possible are fluoridated, there are much less expensive ways to distribute it than to purchase a half-million-dollar van. But the van’s proponents say it is the “most efficient option” for making sure children do not escape getting their fluoride.

Never has it been proven that consuming fluoride in any way helps improve teeth, though, despite what health officials claim. And adding fluoride chemicals to water, which is their preferred method, is a very poor method of delivery even if the chemical did help teeth. This is because 99 percent or more of flouride ends up on lawns or flowing down the drain, rather than actually being ingested.

There is also no way to regulate the ingestion of the so-called “optimum” level of fluoride because individuals drink varying amounts of fluoridated water, and are also exposed to it in unknown amounts through their skin whenever they wash their hands or take a shower. In other words, water fluoridation is one of the most unscientific, unsubstantiated, and ridiculous “public health” schemes to ever be devised, and it is nothing more than forced medication of the masses.

Be sure to check out the laundry list of diseases and health conditions that can develop as a result of fluoride exposure:

http://www.fluoridealert.org/health/

http://www.tampabay.com/news/localg…

Josh Tolley: TSA Check Points Create Terrorist Targets

Tuesday, December 27th, 2011

By Josh Tolley
GCN Live.com

The poor execution of American security under the inept guise of the Department of Homeland Security is becoming more evident through its most visible appendage, the TSA.

While many in the media are exposing the failures (over 25,000 security breaches since 2001) of the TSA and their overlooked sexual assaults on Americans, what nobody seems to be pointing out is that they increase our risk of attack.
The goal of a terrorist is to create enough terror that the people of the targeted demographic will cease to live as they once did. This goal has already been accomplished through the forfeiture of freedoms we have given up for the illusion of protection. Keep in mind that our government leaders remind us that they cannot protect us and make us safe. In the most practical sense, America has lost the war on terrorism.

Beyond that, even the actions carried out by the TSA actually increase your risk of dying at the hands of a terrorist.

Airports:

Even without the 25,000 security breaches since 2001, TSA check points create a large crowd of people. Not only is the crowd large, but it is under the illusion of a “terrorist free” environment. A terrorist’s dream target is a TSA airport check point. A terrorist attack at a TSA check point is not only an easy target, a desired target, but it would leave hundreds dead, the image of protection destroyed, and reinforces the possibility that another airplane attack is possible.

VIPER squads:

At the cost of over $110 million a year, these roving VIPER squads have conducted over 9,300 random searches and have produced ZERO findings. This lack of successfully finding anything, to a terrorist, just further illustrates the vulnerability of our transportation system. This takes a target which may have been perceived by the terrorist as a hard target and turns it into a soft target. Not only have these VIPER squads been 100% ineffective by the TSA’s own admission, but it creates a scenario where the VIPER team’s failure would most likely lead to a false flag event, which would need to happen just to justify their existence, further endangering civilians.

Highway Check Points:

This practice of highway check points is so strategically ignorant it makes me doubt the competence of anyone in charge of protecting citizens on behalf of DHS.

Let me see if I get this straight, in Tennessee the TSA has set up roadside checkpoints which they make the locations known to the public. These check points are to evidently capture your random, run of the mill, terrorist who has decided to commute to his suicide. The terrorist of course is looking for a large group of people to kill. The easy targets are malls, schools, and other public gathering places. The more valuable “golden” target would be those where security personnel are trying to protect people, say a highway road stop. Road stops created by the TSA and coming to a highway near you.

Thus, the TSA decides to stop the flow of traffic, create a crowd, create a target (a far better target than a public building in whatever town they were commuting to), and do so with the inept idea that this will not be noticed by the same terrorist they wish to stop? To further emphasize the TSA’s ignorance of terrorist behavior, they fail to realize that since they make it public knowledge as to where these check points are located, the terrorist would only have to take a different road around the TSA check point.

Not only are all three of these scenarios actually a benefit to the terrorist because they create valuable targets, but it seems to escape the minds of security planners that terrorists want to die. They want to go where security is high and blow themselves up. Notice the number of terrorist attacks outside military installations and embassies!

To make matters worse, we are fighting a war on terror, the enemy is a terrorist, yet we don’t want to define the characteristics of said terrorist for the fear that it might offend people of similar description. However, it is perfectly ok to see everyone as a terrorist so everyone pays the penalty except for the actual terrorist who desires to die for his/her cause.

The loss of freedom, ignorant security strategy, assault at the hand of our protectors and the creation of more valuable terrorist targets, all in the name of security? The TSA should stand for the Terrorist Assistance Administration.


talk radio hostJosh Tolley is the host of The Josh Tolley Show, which airs on GCN Monday-Friday 9:00-11:00am Central Time. Listen to the show On Demand.

Like GCN Live on Facebook and follow on Twitter for more great news, opinions, and announcements from GCN Live’s hosts and staff.

7 Questions: Ron Paul

Tuesday, December 27th, 2011

Two bloggers featured on GCN Live, LD Jackson and Steven Birn, were kind enough to give us their differing analysis of Ron Paul, 2012 Republican presidential candidate, in a piece we’ll call 7 Questions.

1. What do you make of Ron Paul’s stance on foreign policy?

LD Jackson (LD): I believe Ron Paul’s foreign policy would certainly get us headed in the right direction, but it is a legitimate issue for the voters to consider. After all, we are all used to the idea of our troops being stationed all over the globe. We are all used to the idea of them being involved in many other countries, in one way or another. If Ron Paul wins the presidency, his would be a stark reversal of the type of foreign policy we have seen for the past several decades.

The biggest hurdle Ron Paul has with his foreign policy is to convince Americans that it would keep us safe. We are so conditioned to believe we have to operate proactively, that the idea of allowing Iran to develop a nuclear weapon, if they so choose, is hard to swallow. Most Americans do not believe diplomacy will work; therefore a Ron Paul foreign policy of diplomacy, instead of threatened military action or sanctions would not work. I am not convinced that is the case, but it is no small task to convince the voters.

Steven Birn (SB): Ron Paul’s policy concerning Iran shows a fundamental lack of understanding as to what motivates the Iranians. Iran is fighting a holy war and as a result negotiating with them or leaving them to control the middle east isn’t an option in the same way as it might be with a secular country. Iran wants to kill the infidel, which means us and all other non-Muslims. If they get a nuclear weapon, there is little doubt that they would use it. Their own death doesn’t matter to them, after are there are dozens of virgins awaiting them.

Ron Paul’s position puts America in a position of weakness and it creates a major problem for our middle east allies, namely Israel. His position also puts him at odds with 70%+ of the Republican Party. This alone could be his biggest obstacle going forward.

2. What do you make of the controversial Ron Paul newsletters that were released in the 1990s?

LD: From the small amount of research I have done, it appears the newsletter issue has already been debunked and proven to be false. It is normal for ghost writers to be employed in such cases and that seems to be what happened with Ron Paul. I do believe he should have been more careful about choosing who wrote the newsletters, but that doesn’t make him a racist, as some would suggest. All one has to do is look at Paul’s actions to realize he is nothing of the kind. Personally, I believe this is a non-issue.

SB: Supposedly Ron Paul’s newsletters were written by Lew Rockwell. Rockwell at one time was the President of the Ludwig von Mises Institute, which I had gone to for a couple of seminars in college. The Mises Institute has a lot of interesting ideas and arguments. But there was always an underlying hint of anarchy within it. There was also a group, which I believe included Rockwell, that was distinctly Confederate. They had economic arguments for favoring the south, including the fairly plausible argument that white northerners wouldn’t have fought to free black slaves. But that issue was always lurking in the background, which I found bothersome.

Having said that, this issue is irrelevant. Ron Paul’s newsletters may have been an issue in 2008 but no one cares about it now. Maybe if he got the nomination it would matter more. But for the time being, the newsletters don’t matter much.

3. Does Ron Paul have a realistic fighting chance for the GOP nomination outside of Iowa?

LD: I believe Ron Paul’s chances outside of Iowa depends on how he does in the caucuses. Currently, the polls have him at or near the top, but the news media seems to be convinced that the polls are not correct. They are basing that on the fact that Paul does better with voters who are not normally Republican voters. They use that to come to the conclusion that those voters will not show up at the caucuses. I believe that to be a false conclusion.

If Ron Paul wins Iowa, or at least places a close second, it could be the awakening for many voters in the states that hold their primaries later. Winning Iowa doesn’t necessarily guarantee the nomination will go to Paul, but I think it would be a good start. He is being underestimated in Iowa, so winning there could show the rest of the country that he is a serious candidate. So yes, I think he has a realistic chance of winning the GOP nomination, but he has to get past Iowa first.

SB: Outside of Iowa Ron Paul has no chance to win. He has a good ground game in Iowa that has been running hard for six years. Outside of Iowa he has a core group of Ronulans who worship the ground he walks on. Otherwise, he’s hard a hard time gaining new supporters. His position on Iran doesn’t help his cause. He could win Iowa, but he isn’t going to win New Hampshire or South Carolina based on current polls and 2008 results. If he can’t win at least one of those states, he isn’t going to win any.

4. What policy do you most agree with Ron Paul, and what policy do you least agree with Ron Paul? Why?

LD: The policy I agree with most is really difficult. I think it would be safe to say policies, as in plural. What started bringing my attention around to Ron Paul was his accurate prediction of how the housing bubble would burst and how our economy would go in the tank. My main reason for supporting him is the economic policies he is proposing. Our economy is in such terrible shape, mainly because of past policies, and he wants to reverse those, to get the government out of the business of meddling in the economy. It is paramount that we get our government under control and out of the business of manipulation of our economy and our currency. All of the other issues, such as personal liberty and freedom, are important to me, but the economy takes precedence.

The policy on which I disagree most with Ron Paul is easy. That would be abortion. I understand that he disagrees with the practice vehemently. That is a good thing. I also understand that he wants to remove abortion from the federal level and send it back to the individual states. While I agree that the federal government has taken entirely too much power for itself, I am not sure abortion should be completely removed from its jurisdiction. The murder of innocent babies is no small issue and I am not sure it can be dealt with on the state level.

SB: I generally like Ron Paul’s economic policy. I agree we need to cut at least $1 trillion from the budget. We need to shut down several Federal agencies. I wouldn’t mind auditing the Fed, though I question what exactly it will accomplish.

I disagree with Paul vehimently on social issues. Abortion and homosexual marriage aren’t mere state issues. They’re issues of national morality. Ron Paul claims to be pro-life but he views the morning after pill as unlegislatable and a states rights issue. A baby isn’t a state issue, it’s a life deserving of protection. The notion that it isn’t possible to legislate morality or legislate something like the morning after pill is absurd. All law is morality, the question is whose. Even if some people murder their unborn babies with a law against the morning after pill in place, there’s nothing stopping the government from prosecuting the offense. Paul’s argument seems to be that if women will kill their babies anyway there’s no point in legislating against it. One wonders what the point of any law is then.

5. Is Ron Paul a good fit for the Republican party? Is he a good fit for America?

LD: Ron Paul is probably a better fit for America than he is for the Republican Party. I base that conclusion on how his proposed policies go against a lot of what our current party stands for. The most obvious example of those differences is foreign policy. Because he is so straightforward in how he talks about this issue, many in the Republican Party dismiss him out-of-hand. He tells them the truth, instead of what they want to hear. Because the truth is so far removed from the talking points of the Republican Party, it may be difficult for him to overcome.

There is a stark difference between Ron Paul and the other GOP candidates. On a lot of the issues, there is as much a difference between them as there is between Paul and Obama. With his refusal to pander to different groups and to stick to the truth of the issues, it remains to be seen if Ron Paul can be a good fit for America. I think he is exactly what America needs, at this point in our history. It is ironic that he has to get past the Republicans first.

SB: Ron Paul is an interesting person to have within the GOP as he does a good job of shifting focus toward smaller government. If he didn’t hold to such extreme libertarianism on issues of morality and foreign policy, he wouldn’t be a bad nominee. Ron Paul is probably better off in the House trying to move the GOP Caucus to the right.

6. Looking at the remaining seven GOP candidates (nine if you want to include Palin and Trump), rank them in order of who you think is the most likely to win the GOP nomination – NOT what you want, but what you think will happen.

LD: I would rank their chances of winning the GOP nomination as follows: Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Ron Paul, Rick Santorum, Rick Perry, Michele Bachmann, and Jon Huntsman.

SB: At this point it appears to be a battle between Newt and Romney. There’s always a chance that someone like Bachmann pulls off a surprise upset in Iowa. At this time the slight edge goes to Newt as he’s up on Romney in Iowa. After Romney wins New Hampshire, Newt is up in South Carolina and Florida and if he pulls those states off it’s over. If Romney wins Iowa, he’ll end up with the nomination.

7. In your opinion, who is the best GOP candidate to face and beat Obama in 2012?

LD: This one is easy. I will go with Ron Paul. If he can get past the Republican establishment and have the chance to present his case to the rest of the voters, he can beat Barack Obama in 2012. I know a lot of people do not see that as the case, but there is a stark contrast between his record and that of Obama. It would go a long ways towards making the case for Ron Paul to the average American voter. Couple that with his record for telling the truth and I think we could have the recipe for the kind of change we need in Washington.

SB: All of them are the best candidate to defeat Barack Obama. There isn’t one of these candidates that can’t beat him. By far and away Newt would do a better job debating Obama, which alone could make him the better candidate. But when generic Republican beats Obama consistently for a year in the polls, you have to figure any of these Republicans can win once they secure the nomination.


For news and commentary that strives to recognize the reality of politics, visit Political Realities.

Steven Birn is an attorney and conservative political junkie and blogger. For more news and commentary visit Steven Birn Speaks.

Like GCN Live on Facebook and follow on Twitter for more great news, opinions, and announcements from GCN Live’s hosts and staff.

Injured Global Economy Ponders Coming Challenges

Monday, December 26th, 2011

By Bob Chapman
TheInternationalForecaster.com

Debt repayment is a subject few want to discuss, or that few understand. We know most of the largest banks in the world are broke along with at least 6-euro zone nations. There are many others, but the most concerning are the debts of major nations, which are supposedly solvent. Needless to say the US is deeply indebted and the Super-Congress Enabling Committee couldn’t even lay politics aside to cut spending increases.

A bill has been entered into Congress to prohibit US funds being used via the IMF to bail out European banks and governments. We see a scant chance of passage because of the elitist control of both Houses. On the other hand it makes little difference, because the Fed has opened the swap floodgates and other avenues of secret funding to “recapitalize,” bailout, European banks of all sizes and depths of default.

As we end 2011 it is all quiet on the Western Front. Behind the scenes unbeknownst to almost all the elitists are plotting and planning on how to extricate themselves from the morass they have gotten themselves into. How do they put the crisis on the back burner and extend the timeline? The vaunted 6 nations on the edge of default await aid, but one might ask from whom? That solution hasn’t even been sorted out as yet, and we now find France facing a possible two level lowering of debt ratings, but even Germany is not as solvent as they were thought to be. Could it be that France and Germany might not be able to repay their debts? Now you can understand why the money machine, known as the Fed, says nothing about their bailout of Europe. 95% of the population of the world doesn’t even know what a swap is. Even if they did understand they are never going to get the truth from the Fed. We saw that in court and GAO revelations recently.

The European Central Bank, ECB, does not have the Fed’s ability to continue to create money and credit. That means that the taxpayers in each nation must foot the bill, unless the Fed prints money for them. Thus, we see a central bank, which really is not a central bank. Germany is still not allowing the ECB to emulate the Bank of England and Federal Reserve. Germans still vividly remember the Weimar Republic and the resultant rise of National Socialism and Adolph Hitler. Even if such possibilities do not exist today they still see rampant inflation as a result of endless funding. Northern Europeans, in spite of participating in the EU and the euro zone, understand the frailties and cultural differences of their neighbors in the south. Europe has pursed the wrong path for more than two years. There simply isn’t anyway to bail out the six. They have to allow them to default and leave the euro.

The short-term cost is $6 trillion just to go sideways for a year or two. After that the underlying problem will still exist, and it will be worse. Professionals in part recognize the problems and as a result interest rates have risen and the entire European system is under pressure, including their stock markets. We know that “The President’s Working Group on Financial Markets” has been active in markets worldwide, but because it is secret, we do no know the extent of market manipulation in keeping world markets up when they should be down. When Ron Paul becomes President of the United States and the reign of the bankers ends we will then be able to see what these criminals have been up too. A good part of the world is headed into recession and depression. Europe’s plunge into recession is underway and that condition is just going to exacerbate the situation. What we have is a European standoff and the possibility that Germany may go its own way, becomes more plausible with every passing day.

They could leave the euro, let the six nations go under and take their losses and leave the EU as well. Remember, Germany overwhelmingly did not want either but were forced into the situation or order to regain Western Germany. The cost of that effort was outrageous. They were forced to exchange a Deutschmark for a Reich mark, one-for-one. It should be between 30 to 1. Germany is sick and tired of getting the short end of the stick and we believe 65% or more of the German people want out and that may very well happen though few see that possibility. The recent exchange with the British over City of London taxation could well have been a ruse to expedite the German exit from the euro and the EU. This is why we are always thinking outside the box.

In order to circumvent the rules the elitists have formed and funded a new bailout program via the IMF, something the IMF was not created for. That is to bail out Europe. Bailing out singular nations is one thing, but bailing out a whole continent is another. What we should say is the job of the IMF was and is to bailing out countries, so they can pay the interest on their debt to keep the banks solvent.

The big ultimate question is, who will bail out the US? The answer is no one and that is why ultimately there will be a meeting of all nations, which will revalue and devalue all currencies against one another and have a multinational default and debt settlement. That means everyone gets to pay some of the losses, except of course those who own gold and silver related assets. All the elitists know that they can monetize money and credit only for so long before hyperinflation takes place. Thus, there will be an end game.

We will never know whether several weeks ago the German bond auction was for real. Did the government only sell half its bond auction or was it a ruse? From a logical point of view it was a disaster, but everything is not always the way it seems to be. If it were bona fide it would have been an effort to try to force Germany into quantitative easing.

There is no question that the creation of money and credit known as QE has been instrumental in the monetization of debt that has then caused inflation. Professionals and investors are fortunately catching on, but they have no clue how bad this really is and is going to be.

Students of economic history, whether Keynesian or Austrian, knows there is no way of avoiding the collapse of an unlimited credit expansion. The only solution is abandonment of the expansion of money and credit and a purging of the excesses of malinvestment in the system. As we have pointed out regularly over time the elitists who control the world-banking establishment are not going to let that happen if they can help it. They control most governments and as a results most militaries. That is why internment camps have been set up across America to incarcerate Americans as terrorists who disagree with government or more nearly disagree with the elitists. It is a fact that military that are completing their tours are being offered placement at FEMA camps, TSA and other secret operations. Blackwater professionals are now as well being offered positions as well. The internment of average American citizens without charges, who may never be seen again, tortured and murdered on orders from our President will go into action in just two weeks. Our Senators and House representatives voted these conditions for you two weeks ago, overwhelmingly. Needless to say, the yes votes should be thrown out of office. This is the sad state we have come to as we predicted in the early 1960s.

The Illuminists who are attempting to implement world government are not without greed and they push the Keynesian system by creating ever-larger amounts of money and credit that they can profit from. That we have seen for years and today it is totally manifest in the US and world economies. This extension of money and credit allows these malefactors to stay in power and to control our lives by dictatorial power and internment, torture and death if necessary. In addition, the system of taxation, which drains off almost half the profits of industry and individuals, goes into non-production, but more importantly into the hands of politicians, who are directly controlled by elitists, who then use those funds to control the masses.

This game has been going on for centuries, but most citizens wouldn’t know it, because they know little or nothing of history, including many writers We are again in this condition because few wanted to pay attention or were uninterested because they were uninterested or took their freedom and liberty for granted. Those in power know the public will act when it is too late. They will become concerned but never enough to implement real austerity. The public wants to feel no pain, so they demand more money printing taking the easy way out. Keynesianism is a giant corporate fascist welfare system where those at the top continually loot those at the middle and bottom. We have some 40 million people on food stamps.

What does that tell you? The system cannot now function without government handouts. The same is true of Medicaid and extended unemployment and many other government programs. When these programs are ended and they will be ended, people will be totally dependent on government and will do whatever they are told to do. It is time for citizens of America, Britain and Europe to wake up and take your governments back. Doesn’t the setting up of internment camps and staffing them tell you something? All you have to do is open your mouth and off you go to the slammer. Your President is dancing you around with the same promises you heard three years ago. When are Americans going to smarten up? The first victims of internment will be Muslims. Then after the November elections they’ll concentrate on those who are outspoken and militia types. Then they’ll come after us, and other writers and communicators.

The only way we can legally stop these criminals is to elect Ron Paul president and those that think the way he does and understand the problems. If you do not do that we are all doomed. There will be no way back except via revolution and you don’t want to experience that.

In preparation each family should have dehydrated and freeze-dried food, a water filter and a method of protecting their families. All of their residual funds for investment should be in gold and silver shares, coins and bullion. The percentages depend on what is suitable for you. Remember, that with each passing day your dollar or your currency buys less and less. These are long-term investments so treat them as such. Governments and those who control them, bankers, are trying to relieve you of your last penny and at the same time render you dependent. The only way you can preserve your wealth is via gold and silver related assets.

What observers seem to miss is that the leverage in US banks, some 8,100, is about 13 to one. That includes the major banks, which are about 40 to one. In Europe the overall leverage is 25 to 1, which is dangerous territory, because a drop of 4% in asset values will dissipate their total capita. Generally speaking debt as a percentage of GDP for financial institutions in Europe is more than 100 to one and close to 148% to one. These numbers are outrageous and demonstrate how vulnerable the entire financial structure of Europe really is. There is more debt than GDP.

The catalyst to tip Europe over the edge is probably going to be Greece once they have an election and default. In the meantime French, Irish, German, Spanish and Italian banks have to roll over 1/3rd to ½ of their debt. This is going to be a staggering refunding considering Germany could not recently sell half of its Treasury bonds. 2012 will be very eventful, as 8 major European countries have to roll 19% of their entire debt on average. These numbers do not include unfunded liabilities. European countries cannot raise this kind of money and so we expect to see perhaps as many as six countries leave the euro, and the euro zone just may be history. In fact in chain reaction all Europe could financially collapse. For those of you who do not know it, China is Europe’s biggest trading partners and the US accounts for 21% of its exports with Europe. If this happens, and it probably will, the economies of Europe, China and the US will be in freefall.

As we predicted when the euro was $1.38 we said it could easily fall to $1.18 and then to one to one. We could see higher interest rates, lower sovereign ratings for France and maybe even Germany. We could easily see the euros value back at 199 levels. There is not only tremendous stress on the financial system, but also on the physical economies. The disease is not being treated. In addition, interest rates are rising and that presents a whole new set of problems.