Archive for October, 2011

Washington’s agenda revealed: US-backed rebels ask NATO to ‘stay in Libya’

Friday, October 28th, 2011

Patrick Henningsen
GCN Live.com

It seems that Libya’s US-backed Rebels don’t quite possess the stomach for regime change that their bosses in Washington DC and London have.

The west’s new vichy-style government in Libya, aka the ‘National Transitional Council’ (NTC) have now asked NATO to still until 2012, this allegedly in order ‘to stop Gaddafi loyalists fleeing’.

It’s more likely, however, that the rebels are fearing reprisals from the thousands of innocent Libyans who have been maimed, raped and whose family members have been killed in the name of NATO’s liberation of Libya. The list of atrocities done in their name seems to be endless, with new reports of Rebel mass graves and executions coming out daily.

Of course, nothing defines NTC’s barbaric nature better than the brutal execution of Moammar Gaddafi, beaten and shot to death, along with members of his family in Sirte on Thurs. Yes, these are the violent animals that US President Barack Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and British PM David Cameron have backed and fought alongside of in the war for Libya’s riches.

Call it mission creep, or call it 21st century imperialism, but it’s very easy to gather from this latest move that the NTC were never stable enough to facilitate thew huge number of US and European multinational companies who are currently being lined up for hundreds of new ‘reconstruction projects’ and contracts in the country.

Far from being in control of the country and able to govern, it appears that NATO’s NTC rag-tag band of international al-Qaida mercenaries and tribal paramilitary gangs do not have anything near a mandate by the people to rule Libya, as western TV audiences been led to believe for the last 9 months.

The London Guardian reported today on this latest bombshell, announced at a meeting with the US brokered military alliance in Qatar on Wednesday, where NTC interim leader Mustafa Abdel Jalil announced:

“We look forward to Nato continuing its operations until the end of the year,” said Jalil, adding that stopping the flight of Gaddafi supporters to other countries was a priority. “We seek technical and logistics help from neighbouring and friendly countries,”

Among other illegalities which contravene the UN’s flimsy Resolution 1973, which only allowed for a no-fly zone over Libya, Qatar stood in for the US as far back as March 2011, when it recognised the NTC as the legitimate authority in Libya. Writing its own rules, Qatar then went ahead to supply NATO-Rebel fighters with military provisions, heavy weaponry and more than $400m (£250m) in cash towards regime change.

Worse yet, it was revealed today that the Qatari government has provided boots on the ground in support of the US and NATO’s plan for regime change in Libya. According to Ahram Online:

For the first time, Qatar reveals that it had soldiers on the ground across Libya assisting in the fight against Gaddafi’s regime, with the country to play a major role in integrating the rebels into the Libyan military…

“We were among them and the numbers of Qataris on the ground were hundreds in every region,” said Qatari chief of staff Major General Hamad bin Ali Al-Atiya.

Under international law, this move by long-time US puppet Qatar is a flagrant violation of UN 1973, and other international laws, a crime of opportunity which should place Qatar firmly in international court.

The US agenda in Libya was always to exact regime change- but without getting its hands dirty by being caught in public with troops on the ground. In this twisted operation, it assigned the job of fall guy to its chief partner in the Middle East, Qatar.

But now it appears that the US and Britain are both reported to have had special forces troops on the ground in Libya in the run-up to Gaddafi’s assassination last week.

Israeli intelligence news service DEBKA quoted US sources who admit that American drones kept Gaddafi’s home in Sirte under surveillance, while it was surrounded by US and British forces.

American sources are willing to admit that US drones operated by pilots from Las Vegas pinpointed the fugitive ruler’s hideout in Sirte and kept the building under surveillance for two weeks, surrounded by US and British forces.

Both therefore had boots on the ground in breach of the UN mandate which limited NATO military intervention in Libya to air strikes.

In addition, US emirate puppet Qatar put its hands in the cookie jar very early on, providing the marketing and facilitating the selling of rebel-controlled Libyan oil exports beginning in March – oil which, under Gaddafi, was used to pay government salaries and state benefits on which most families depend. That system is now in chaos, as NTC Rebels and assorted western companies scramble to carve up the country’s state-owned assets and natural resources.

The UK was then next to join in the party, when on Oct 4th, independent oil and gas explorer Heritage Oil became the first foreign firm to pump Libyan oil thanks to its acquisition of a Benghazi-based oil company.

And so it begins. “The liberation of Libya”, to be divided up by a series of multinational companies, along with a permanent attachment of US and European military specialists.

In a few months time, internal struggles will be rife and naturally, NATO will still be there- along with UN blue helmets. Whatever is left of the original NTC and their CIA contracted al-Qaida freedom fighters, will likely have ripped each other to pieces fighting over the scraps of wealth that are left by the US, Europe and Qatar.

Surprised?

This writer is not, as it was easily predicted on Oct 4th that NATO would be staying in Libya, and that there would be boots on the ground in 2012:

By that time, all the horrors and atrocities which have been carried out by NATO and its Rebels will have been flushed out, and with any luck, people in the west might realize who brought real brutality and tragedy to the country of Libya.

Let the rebuilding commence.

Europe Wallows In Insolveable Problems

Friday, October 28th, 2011

By Bob Chapman
TheInternationalForecaster.com

We address this European issue, because soon it will debut in the US. The comprehensive policy response, which we have been told existed, really doesn’t exist. We found that out last Friday. All the lies of the past two weeks by various European governments and bureaucrats, as well as Mr. Sarkozy and Mrs. Merkel, were just more delaying tactics to attempt to find a solution to Europe’s financial dilemma. As part of this display of smoke and mirrors, these hopeful signs, generated large gains in US and European stock markets, of course, with the assistance of the “President’s Working Group on Financial Markets.” At the same time as usual gold, silver and commodities markets were attacked viciously. This is how markets and economies are manipulated when in control of our corporatist fascist government.

Following the lead of the Federal Reserve two weeks ago both the Bank of England and the European Central Bank added more wood to the fire by expanding their issuance of money and credit. As we have previously pointed out the system cannot function without perpetual quantitative easing or stimulus. That is because no attempt has been made to solve the problems of the economy and unemployment. In the US, UK and Europe only the financial sectors and governments have been recapitalized. That is ongoing. This is the solution offered by the Fed and all others should follow such dictates. Policymakers may be energized with three conferences on tap, but that means little. Germany is the key, the German people, and they are not budging. They have had it. Being forced for 66 years to do as they have been told. That era of allied hegemony is over. While they are at it they should remove foreign troops from their soil.

Central banks are accommodators to keep their system going, because if the elitists lose control of the financial systems they lose their power and wealth. That in part is why no effort has been made to restore economies. These extraordinary measures have for the moment kept US, UK and European economies from falling off a cliff, but that game cannot be played indefinitely. One of the factors not mentioned and shunted aside is the penalty of inflation from unbridled monetary excesses. In the US we see 11.6%, in England 12.5% and in Europe 7%. What professionals do not want to recognize is that economies and the financial structure are fighting a losing battle.

Markets have discounted a perfect recovery for Europe and that is not going to happen. If they work it out it will take years to reach normality. If they purge the system it will take five years, which will produce great pain and deprive the bankers, Wall Street and the City of London of their power.

Britain, supposedly is suffering from the European financial contagion. We do not think they are as yet, but they could suffer in the future. Britain created their own set of problems and they will have to live with them.

We have heard NYC legacy banks are on the hook for about $150 billion Greek CDS, credit default swaps. $39 billion of that belongs to JPMorgan. That is the main reason why the US Treasury and the Fed want Greece bailed out and all European banks recapitalized, along with unlimited issuance of money and credit.

It is said that a debt to GDP ratio of 120% or higher is irreversible. That is Italy’s number and in addition they have a major refunding in the near future. If Germany just had a failed auction, does one really believe that Italy can complete theirs? This is why the ECB has been buying Italian bonds in an attempt to drive down interest rates that has risen. This type of condition faces a number of European countries such as Spain. This problem is handled by ring fencing, like circling the wagons. Government splits the financial entities in two. A good bank with the profitable assets and a bad bank with all the problem assets, which government guarantees, so that the citizens can pay for the bad assets created by the banks. The banks are taken off the hook. These are the same banks that caused all these problems in the first place.

The EFSF may become a bond insurance operation based on other insurance, which would allow leverage. Thus, instead of having $500 billion available for bailouts perhaps $2 to $3 trillion would be available. This is what the contention is between France and Germany. The Germans do not want to do that. This lending would be similar to Eurobonds.

The problem that the European markets have is that confidence and credibility are gone. For proof just look at last week’s failed German auction. If the Germans fail to sell all their bonds how can other lesser-rated countries sell theirs? If Germany’s experience is a guideline how can the EFSF expect investors to buy their bonds?

The basis to these plans to raise funds are austerity programs. The European economy is slowing down and austerity could bring it to a halt as tax revenues fall and the ability to service debt is lessened. This process is not stabilizing – it is degenerative. We have seen it in country after country controlled by IMF loans. Eventually the loans cannot be serviced and the push for privatization takes place. That is when the real raping takes place. In this process of austerity citizens demonstrate, sometimes get violent and sometimes that leads to revolution. At best there is destabilization and its social consequences. The only way to avoid this is to phase in austerity and create enough liquidity to allow the system to adjust.

The German people, the Bundestag and the Bundesrat have said no more money, no more loans. Thus, with no one to back new debt, that is powerful enough to handle it, we see little hope of solution. France is in no position to do so. It currently is facing the possibility of a sovereign downgrade. We are closing in on the end of the game and that will be disruptive not only for Europe, but internationally as well. Can you image stock markets rising in the midst of all of this? This is the work of central banks’, Treasuries and, of course, the “President’s Working Group on Financial Markets.” Some are going to be in for a big surprise.

Europeans are going to be lucky to buy a couple of years and even if they do that they haven’t solved the problems. We are looking at an insolvable problem that bankers and politicians do not want to contemplate, because it will deprive them of all their power and that is what all this is all about. They either purge the system now, or it will purge itself later and it will be far worse.

As we move into this week there are many unresolved differences between France and Germany, the biggest players and the FINNS and the Dutch are tending to side with the German population. The scope of the Greek bailout has created unease, because the program laid out for Greece, which was supposed to be completed by now, but won’t be for another year. The amount of money Greece needs is far more than what has been budgeted and there are daily demonstrations that have the average Greek saying, we don’t care what kind of deal you have made we are not going to abide by it. Government revenues have plunged as a result.

From our point of view markets are reflecting a panacea and that is not going to be the case. There still is no deal and investors believe they have one and that is not the case, at least not yet.

Negotiations on combining the EU’s temporary and planned rescue funds as of mid-2012, while scrapping a ceiling on bailout spending, accelerated this week after efforts to leverage the temporary fund ran into ECB opposition. These bankers and their political minions are relentless.

The attempt of converting part of the EFSF into a sovereign bond insurance operation is out, because of what we pointed out earlier – it is illegal. The Germans will not yield to the French (US) of turning the EFSF into a leveraged bank structure. The ECB has been apposed to lending to the EFSF, which makes the insurance structure impossible. Having Mr. Trichet leave at this time is unfortunate because the successor is overwhelmed with unsolvable problems. Ring-fencing does not work either. It just moves debt from one place to another temporarily.

As Europe wallows in insolvable problems the US Fed is finally going to have a QE 3, which should have occurred on September 15th. Being talked about behind the scenes are large-scale purchases of MBS and better known as toxic waste mortgages. That would allow the speculators to buy long-term Treasuries, other bonds and equities and it allows the public to pick up the losses from banks and other financial institutions. Just another sweetheart deal this could be a reason the stock and bond markets are so strong. If you haven’t noticed Mr. Bernanke and the Fed’s popularity are at all-time lows. Another blast of firepower would in their eyes put them back in the plus column. Such large-scale purchases would tend to provide liquidity for foreign sellers of Treasuries and Agencies as well. They could then reduce their dollar denominated exposure without disrupting the market. In order to accomplish this MBS-CDO policy, the Fed would have to create more money out of thin air and add to the monetization process, which creates more inflation. The Fed calls it expanding their nearly $3 trillion balance sheet further. This process would reduce pressure on longer-term rates of an average of seven years. That would reduce mortgage rates, which in turn stimulate real estate sales. This is a long-term project and the benefits are questionable. If unemployment is 22.6%, more than a fifth of the population cannot purchase homes. In addition the unsold inventory is 3.8 million homes and growing and builders are building 620,000 additional homes a year. We wonder what they are thinking about? Overall the goal of putting more people into homes won’t work very well, but it will supply more liquidity to the system. It won’t create jobs and it will bail out the lenders further again. Doesn’t anyone realize what is really going on here? It is another bank bailout, and a further monetization of MBS. The Fed’s idea is to rid bank books of unsaleable liabilities and increase their liquidity positions, so they can buy more Treasuries, Agencies and to speculate. These emergency operations should not be ongoing. They should stop and these insolvent lenders should not be allowed to go under. That does not happen in this new world of too big to fail. They would take the power away from those who caused all these problems in the first place. That in turn would eliminate the control of the Illuminati. As a result of these policies the Fed continues to loose credibility and public confidence and the same is true of UK and European central banks.

Such policies are very inflationary and steal the purchasing power of the public. You cannot force the issue indefinitely and the results are always temporary. The Fed and other central bankers are fooling no one. It is just one bank bailout after another with no end in sight, while economies slowdown for lack of real assistance and unemployment rises. How long will the people tolerate such reckless money creation for the sake of the few and not for the people? The politicians say nothing and aid and abet the process because 90% of them are bought and paid for.

The very idea that banks should be subsidized and are too big to fail is simply ridiculous. All of these sort of schemes just delay the inevitable, create market preferences, where some elitist firms get assistance and other firms do not. That is a condition that has been prevalent for three years. Frankly, we’ll be surprised if Germany makes any concessions.

Part of the outcome of operation twist, as we mentioned before, is a higher stock market, which we see in progress. The Fed expects some of the liquidity derived from their purchase of toxic waste to go into speculation in the stock markets. The Fed has already learned that due to the low interest rate returns it drives what normally are conservative investors into the stock market where they lose their money. Obviously the Fed could care less. Their only mission is to save the financial sector where all the power lies. They could care less about capital investment and job creation. What the Fed is doing is acting in furtherance of a dysfunctional market place. The financial masters of the universe are about to throw caution to the winds. They want to keep their corruption system in tact and it is not going to work. It is just a question of when they lose control and have their next war.

Barb Adams: The National Popular Vote Compact

Friday, October 28th, 2011

By Barb Adams
GCN Live.com

While the mainstream media is focused on the Occupy Wall Street reform movement, there’s another reform movement underway that may change the way we elect our presidents in the future, possibly even affecting the 2012 election.

The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPV) is a bill currently moving state-by-state to guarantee the presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (including the District of Columbia). Sponsors of the bill say that it will preserve the Electoral College while reforming it to ensure that every vote in every state will matter in every presidential election. Proponents of the bill point to the shortcomings of our current system of the winner-take-all rule, which allowed a candidate to win the presidency without winning the most popular votes in 4 out of 56 elections. Additionally, they point out that the winner-take-all rule forces presidential candidates to ignore states where they are either well ahead or hopelessly behind.

The NPV bill has already been enacted into law in 9 states possessing 132 electoral votes (VT, MD, WA, IL, NJ, DC, MA, CA, and HI), which is 49% of the 270 votes necessary to activate the legislation. According to the official NPV website, the bill has also passed 31 legislative chambers in 21 jurisdictions as well (AR, CA, CO, CT, DC, DE, HI, IL, ME, MD, MA, MI, NV, NJ, NM, NY, NC, OR, RI, VT, and WA). The NPV bill has been endorsed by such organizations as Common Cause, the League of Women Voters, FairVote, the NAACP, and Sierra Club, as well as the New York Times, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Chicago Sun-Times, Los Angeles Times, Miami Herald, and numerous representatives from both political parties.

Although currently on many states’ legislative agendas, most people are unaware that this bill is being voted on in their states. And if enough states vote “yes” on the bill, then it will do away with the way we elect our presidents in the future, possibly even as soon as 2012 if it is in effect by then.

But is the National Popular Vote Compact a positive move in the right direction, or is it, as some claim, just one more step in the erosion of our freedom and another step toward tyranny?

According to the NPV website, Colorado is one of the states that passed legislation moving in the direction of a National Popular Vote. Upon investigation, however, it turns out Colorado did not pass such legislation, and there is opposition to the NPV movement in Colorado. Colorado Attorney General John Suthers has urged the Colorado General Assembly to keep Colorado out of the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, stating “There are many reasons to oppose this ill-conceived legislation, not the least of which are its significant legal implications. Instead of confining electoral disputes to certain, specific districts, the Interstate Compact would disperse election litigation among all 175,000 precincts across America. Our court system and our electoral process could be crippled as a result.”

Suthers goes on to state “This legislation is an affront to the framework designed by the Founding Fathers to give all states political relevance in presidential elections. It has serious Constitutional implications, and at the very least, the issue should be put to a vote of the people.”

Opponents of the NPV bill point out that the bill is a “progressive strategy,” which will undermine the role of the states in electing a president. By transferring electoral votes to a National Popular Vote, it would usurp the role of the states as safeguarded by the Constitution. They contend that the NPV movement is an “explicit attempt to defeat the careful Constitutional amendment process with no public knowledge, no voter input, no public referendums, and no input from states which object to this measure.”

Those in opposition also note that states with larger populations, especially those with heavily populated cities, would pick the president. States such as Illinois (notorious for political corruption), California, New York, and New Jersey have already passed the NPV into law. Opponents are concerned that “states that have been trending GOP and don’t support NPV won’t matter; states with large land expanses sprinkled with Conservative voters and rural farmers won’t matter; suburbanites who pay the taxes that support city entitlements won’t matter; and the original fair and balanced Electoral College won’t matter.”

Who is behind the National Popular Vote Compact? An article in Gulag Bound lists George Soros and his son, Jonathan, who was quoted in 2008 as saying “It’s time to junk the Electoral College.” But for what purpose? According to the article, to “Take the 2012 election—and those that follow—by the cheapest, most expedient means…focusing ‘electioneering efforts’ in major population areas to make those votes overwhelm the votes of the rest of the US, under cover of populist propaganda to appear more truly democratic.” The article also lists Akhil Reed Amar and Vikram Amar as the strategists behind the NPV. The two brothers are “highly credentialed attorneys who devised this state bill as a strategy to get around the normal requirements for Constitutional amendment, and instead undermine the Electoral College by bypassing Congress and the voters.”

So is the National Popular Vote Compact really just a reform movement to improve the election process, or is it simply a step closer to tyranny?


talk radio hostBarb Adams is the host of Amerika Now talk radio show, which airs on GCN Saturdays 9:00p-1:00am Central Time. Listen to the show On Demand.

 

 

Like GCN Live on Facebook and follow on Twitter for more great news, opinions, and announcements from GCN Live’s hosts and staff.

Climate Crazies try to piggy-back on Occupy London LSX

Thursday, October 27th, 2011

Patrick Henningsen
GCN Live.com

It was only a matter of time.

When the Occupy Wall Street movement pitched its tent up in New York in mid September, their singularity of purpose seemed to be tangible enough- including actual real world issues and problems like mega banks ripping off the population, lobbyist running the US government and a severely injured democratic system.

Occupy London LSX is due to kick off this weekend with its sights on the London Stock Exchange (LSX) at Paternoster Square. Similarly its agenda seems sensible thus far- banker bailouts at a time of austerity, a culture of taxation, a time of growing inequality and ridiculous unemployment.

Laura Taylor, a supporter of OccupyLSX, echoed what’s on most people’s minds: “Why are we paying for a crisis the banks caused? More than a million people have lost their jobs and tens of thousands of homes have been repossessed, while small businesses are struggling to survive. Yet bankers continue to make billions in profit and pay themselves enormous bonuses, even after we bailed them out with £850bn.”

So now that this global movement has gained some momentum and substantial recognition, it seems only fair that it makes room for other causes suffering from an attention deficit. If they do, they will need to hurry before the first snow falls on what looks to be the coldest winter in years. Yes, we’re talking here about the global warming and climate change crowd.

‘Climate action’ group 350.org have managed to book a front row seat on the Occupy London bandwagon, thanks in part to having Naomi Klein on their board of directors.

Aside from Michael Moore, few will argue that famed anti-capitalist Naomi Klein is probably the most recognizable name in the anti-globalization, anti-corporate criminal crusades. Her books and films are groundbreaking.

Klein added to her climate gospel, “I am talking about changing the underlying values that govern our society. That is hard to fit into a single media-friendly demand, and it’s also hard to figure out how to do it.”

Indeed, it’s very hard to figure out, especially if you have taken your vows to the IPCC’s official UN religion of global warming.

Unfortunately, 350.org and Naomi Klein’s mission is based on the same pseudo-science that ruined the reputations of both the UN labs at East Anglia University and Penn State. Yet, they really believe that “350 means climate safety.”

In the last four years, scores of once true climate believers have defected over to the common sense camp, once they realized the powerful forces who have been driving the multi trillion dollar carbon economy plan. Once they learned that the whole hoax originated at the Club of Romethe ultra elitist organization that openly admit how it invented the global warming- as a means to manipulate the world to accept a world government, they would have distanced themselves from Al Gore’s fundamentalist camp.

Only last month, it was Nobel Laureate Prof Ivar Giaever who resigned from the American Physical Society, and who admited in his exiting environmental remarks, ““Global warming has become the new religion.”

350.org add here, “To preserve our planet, scientists tell us we must reduce the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere from its current level of 392 parts per million to below 350 ppm. But 350 is more than a number—it’s a symbol of where we need to head as a planet.”

Klein, like every other respected and knowledgeable professional who innocently dived head-first down the global warming rabbit hole, probably did so with the most sincere intentions. No one can doubt that Klein’s anti-pollution and anti-corporate looting work is exemplary.

But the intellectual obstacle that most climate change true believers struggle to overcome- Klein included, is separating the real issue of pollution (which most reasonable people do not want), from the contrived issue of CO2 heating the atmosphere- which has been proven over, and over to be an invention of a few well-paid, crafty scientists affiliated with the IPCC.

Just like the Titanic, most climate crusaders will not see the iceberg until long after their ship is sinking.

One of the challenges facing the ‘Global Occupy’ movement is a challenge which faces every movement in its infancy. Success is often dependent on the movement’s ability to focus on a core set of issues, and draw up a list of real demands. After that, the movement will want to see some results, and will use their people power as leverage until some of these demands are actually met, or until some of these problems are addressed by government and society. OWS has made some progress in this area, but as the movement is only a few weeks old, it’s clear they have a lot of ground to cover before they arrive at a manifesto.

The key is to identify real problems, which can be solved with real solutions- unlike man-made global warming and climate change, which are now proven to be not-so-real-world problems, and therefore do not have any real solutions.

If global warming/climate change is injected into the global occupy movement, it will be the equivalent of throwing a massive party and then spiking the bunch bowl with some hallucinogenic drug. There goes your focus, there goes your balance… and there goes your chance at reality.

It may be only a matter of days before the high priest of climate change himself, Al Gore, will peacock his way through Liberty Square, fawning for crowds on Wall Street in lower Manhattan, and later in London.

Dear Naomi Klein: Let’s pool our resources and try to tackle the real problems first.

American Travelers Continue To Rebel Against TSA Body Scanners

Thursday, October 27th, 2011

Steve Watson
GCN Live.com

Americans continue to direct concern, anger and derision toward the TSA over the agency’s aggressive presence in the nations airports, newly released records have shown.

The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) has obtained 241 pages of passenger complaints filed with the TSA by everyday Americans, dating back to early 2010.

EPIC uncovered the documents via a Freedom of Information Act request as part of its ongoing lawsuit concerning the use of the radiation firing body scanners by the TSA.

“The documents reveal that travelers are angry and frustrated about TSA screening procedures.” EPIC states on its website.

“Travelers expressed concern about radiation risks to children, the elderly, and those with special needs.” the statement continues.

“Other travelers wrote the fact that the machines could capture naked images as unacceptable. One traveler said, “using [the full body scanners] is an extreme invasion of privacy.”

Previously, in March 2010, EPIC revealed that there had been more than 600 formal complaints about body scanners the previous year alone.

The documents revealed anger at TSA officials for refusing to offer passengers a pat-down alternative, as well as forcing children to go through machines.

The TSA attempted to downplay the issue as insignificant, claiming that over 600 complaints about body scanners, which were at the time installed in just 21 airports in the U.S., was an “infinitesimally small” number.

The agency, aided by the establishment media, suggested that the scanners were being meekly accepted by a compliant public, when the exact opposite was the case.

Later in the year, in November 2010, the issue blew up again and the ACLU revealed that it received a monumental wave of complaints, regarding everything from gawking by TSA agents to full on groping.

The TSA continued to claim that the overall public concern over scanners and pat-downs was minimal, even suggesting that a planned nationwide “opt out” protest had been a dismal failure.

However, it soon emerged that in reality the TSA had turned off many of its naked body scanners across the country, and scaled back the invasive searches for one day in a hastily crafted PR stunt to mute the impact of the protest.

In December of last year it also emerged that TSA workers were even complaining about the agency’s procedures. Concern among workers was particularly focused on the levels of radiation they were being subjected to in having to operate the body scanners.

Further documents published by EPIC in June of this year, revealed how TSA workers became concerned over a “cancer cluster” amongst screening agents at Boston Logan International Airport, and how the federal agency tried to cover-up the complaints.

As we have tirelessly reported, the machines continue to emit radiation that respected health authorities have warned will cause cancer. Despite agency claims to the contrary, the millimeter wave machines “tear apart DNA” to produce their image, while the backscatter devices fire ionizing radiation into the body.

Numerous highly respected universities and health bodies, including Johns Hopkins, Columbia University, the University of California, and the Inter-Agency Committee on Radiation Safety, have all warned that the health threat posed by the scanners has not been properly studied and could lead to increased cancer rates.


Steve Watson is the London based writer and editor for Alex Jones’ Infowars.net, and Prisonplanet.com. He has a Masters Degree in International Relations from the School of Politics at The University of Nottingham in England.