Archive for September, 2011

Buffett’s Plan Doesn’t Vibe With ‘Buffett Rule’

Friday, September 30th, 2011

By John Palm, Editor
GCN Live.com

The White House and President Obama have been touting the “Buffett Rule” as the catalyst to raise taxes on the rich, but Warren Buffett’s comments seem to insinuate that something got lost in translation.


Warren Buffett
Courtesy Reuters

The “Buffett Rule” was created around wealthy businessman Warren Buffett’s assertion that he should be taxed equal to his lower-salaried employees. The rule says that no millionaire should pay a smaller tax rate than the middle-class.

GCN reported earlier this month that those who are millionaires and pay a smaller tax rate than middle-class people makeup a small portion of wealthy Americans.

Now, Warren Buffett, in an interview on CNBC, makes it clear that there are discrepancies between his ideal plan and the White House’s plan.

In the aforementioned article, GCN pointed out that many investors are taxed less due to lower tax rates on profits made from dividends and capital gains.

This concept is very similar to Buffett’s comments in the Friday morning interview.

“Somebody making $50 million a year playing baseball, his taxes won’t change. Make $50 million a year appearing on television, his income won’t change,” Buffett said regarding what his plan would look like. “But, if they make a lot of money and pay a very low tax rate, like me, it would be changed by a minimum tax that would only bring them up to what other people pay.”

Buffett continued: “My program is to have a tax on ultra-rich people who are paying very low tax rates. Not just all rich people. It would probably apply to 50,000 people in a population of 300 million.”

This appears to differ from the White House’s proposal on a couple levels.

First, Buffett does not claim that the rich do not pay “their fair share” – the line that has been said by President Obama and the White House. Buffett says those who are not paying the fair share are people “like me.”

Second, Buffett is concerned with the “ultra-rich” not paying their fair share. Obama’s new jobs plan is set to raise taxes in 2013 on families with a taxable income of $250,000 – not exactly the “ultra-rich.”

Throughout the interview, which can be seen below, Buffett avoids endorsing any plan President Obama has proposed.

It appears the comments that fueled the creation of the “Buffett Rule” were taken out of context and, to some, appear to be tax-raising propaganda.

 

Recent Gold Takedown A Form of Economic Warfare

Friday, September 30th, 2011

By Bob Chapman
TheInternationalForecaster.com

The takedown of gold and silver markets over the past two weeks signified a new milestone in corruption, brazenness, arrogance and it reveals the level of evil control behind our government. This past week, in just one week, saw gold fall almost $200 and silver about $10.00. We have been involved in gold and silver for 53 years and the only event that comes close to this was October 19, 1987, when we witnessed the Bank of England sell down gold $100.00 under the orders of the Fed and the US Treasury, which borrowed the gold from the IMF. That was illegal, but that means little to the Illuminists who do as they please. Today thanks to Ronald Reagan we have the “President’s Working Group on Financial Markets,” which has legitimatized corruption to conform to the Keynesian model of corporatist fascism. After the close on Friday we were informed, that the CME, which controls the Comex, had raised margin requirements on gold by 21%, silver 16% and in copper by 18%. In retrospect it is obvious that many banking insiders and traders knew early in the week that this momentous psychological warfare was going to be unleashed on these markets. Your government definitely rigged these markets. Today in America and many other places as well, crime pays. What has been done to investors over this past week is not only a crime, but also a disgrace to all Americans.

Let us now look at the flipside. All is not lost, because there is a limit to the damage that can be done. The paper attack on gold was concentrated and accomplished by using futures, options and derivatives. Thus far there is no evidence of any major sales of gold or silver. This in the past has generated very short terms of suppression. The fundamentals have not changed one bit and if anything they are stronger than ever. The world is in the midst of financial collapse. It could take a few months to fall or several years. We do not have a presence behind the scenes, but we do know history and we know what these criminals are up too and what the end game is and that is world government. We have to back into time sequence. That has thus far been enough to help us to make excellent calls. The call this time is we are approaching another bottom. A bottom that probably won’t be seen again. Major buyers of gold and silver have to be waiting with open arms for such a great opportunity to purchase both metals at bargain basement prices. There are sovereigns who are loaded with US dollars, who have been waiting for just such an opportunity to sell them into a strong dollar market to purchase inexpensive gold and silver. Today’s market is totally different than the gold and silver markets of just two years ago. Big players are big buyers. Prior to that the opposite was true as sovereigns were sellers year after year, and both were transferred from weak to stronger hands. The monetary and fiscal situations in Europe, the UK and US are in a shambles. The privately owned Federal Reserve, the Bank of England and the European central bank have all lost credibility. Just look at the reception “Operation Twist” received – bonds rose and the stock market was hit by a typhoon. The Fed has lost its credibility in the investment arena worldwide, because of forced compromise to existing problems. The fed simply didn’t have the guts to implement a QE 3. If the Fed is not quickly forthcoming with a new plan the Dow could fall thousands of points. The damage to gold and silver is already in the history books and the turn back up is already taking place. No matter what the powers that be do they cannot for any period of time control gold and silver prices. There are too many buyers who want to dump fiat currencies. Under the circumstances the Twist was the wrong choice at the wrong time. Financial professionals worldwide believe it is a joke. They see the lack of proper action, the activation for events for more damaging then those of 2008 and if something doesn’t happen this week markets and economies are doomed. The elitists knew this and that is why they attacked gold, silver and commodities. This was so investors would think it was a general overall retreat not a reflection of Fed incompetence. Their fall had nothing to do with reality and everything to do with smoke and mirrors. This should not surprise anyone. It has been used over and over again by the gold and silver suppression cartel.

In reaction to Mr. Bernanke’s folly stock markets worldwide fell about 5% in just two days, which was a considerable feat, piling on to previous losses. Friday would have been a loser as well, but for the PPT being assisted by short covering. This poor choice of assistance has slammed the market and it has set the stage for a monster rally in gold and silver and commodities as well. The idea of pegging interest rates on Treasury debt is foolhardy in the current environment. Subsidizing rates leads to imbalance and losses. This and zero interest rate loans to banks, and massive monetization are going to eventually raise havoc with the economy, not to mention climbing inflation. It should also be noted that all these actions encourage more leveraged speculation. The elitist should learn that all their machinations won’t work especially these attacking gold silver and commodities. We might add that attacking every world currency won’t work either. The elitists in brokerage and banking are making a killing in this slaughter, but on the other hand it gives us cheap prices to buy into.

This latest fiasco gives us two major problems. The other naturally being Europe and Greece. Duress isn’t the word for it. Global systemic risk lurks around every corner. In Europe the ESRB has called upon governments to prepare capital injections for banks, which were close to failure, or failed stress tests. The taxpayer is to be the lender of last resort. At this juncture those who do not recognize all of these machinations as a Ponzi scheme just do not get it. As we saw in QE 1 all the effort was put into saving the financial sector, and in Europe presently we are seeing the same thing happen. At the moment at least, and we do not expect any quick recoveries, Europe is weaker and in more serious trouble than the UK and US. The problems of Europe, the US and UK have now as well spread contagiously into Asia, its financial system and into their economies as exports fall. Europe is one step away from losing control. The question is how long will it take? We do not know, but we will have a better idea after September 29th. Then we will have to reassess Europe’s public and banking debt and bad debt problems. If you remember we predicted this crisis occurring a year ago. Well, here it is. What Brits and Americans fail to understand is that the worst is ahead for them as well.

Make no mistake Europe is facing another liquidity crisis worse than the Lehman crisis. This crisis is being exacerbated by massive markets manipulation by major US and UK banks and brokerage houses. They will do just about anything to gain an edge. You saw this last week in European, UK and US markets including commodities, gold and silver. These criminal opportunists are going to play this game to the bitter end, because they will not accept a purge of the system.

In the past spring we could see problems arising at banks and in the corporate world. Now we see those conditions manifesting themselves. These were the institutions that paid no heed to prudent lending and now are paying for it dearly. US money market funds and other institutions have pulled 2/3′s of their short-term investments out of EU banks, particularly in France. In addition European corporations are withdrawing funds from French banks and lodging the deposits at the ECB. It is not surprising to us that the Rothschilds had to come to the aid of Soc Gen three weeks ago.

The US has its share of shaky banks. We all should be aware of the condition of BofA and the Bank of NY. They are not the only US banks in trouble in the too-big-to fail category. There are a score of them that the media conveniently fails to report on. Many of these banks are finally being sued for fraud. Most of their officers should have been charged criminally long ago. The mortgage securitizations they were involved in were in some of the worst financial scams in history. Even worse yet, were the rating companies that courts have let totally off the hook. The complicity and criminality jumps right out into your face. As you can see in American society some are more equal than others.

Even German banks have not escaped the lack of capital, obviously having lots of bad assets on their books. They could need an infusion of some $200 billion. This is fairly widespread. They all made similar errors. We have always thought there was more to Germany’s bank problems than met the eye. We still believe there was a secret deal between these banks and the Fed. Why else would it have taken on 60% of American banks’ toxic waste? It is of interest as well that the IMF says European banks could be short capital of $270 billion.

The European crisis is still escalating and Ben Bernanke has chosen the wrong vehicle, operation Twist, for recovery. Mr. Bernanke and the Fed had best have a plan B for this week. For the moment the stock market decline has been arrested by the PPT, but for how long? At the same time this same group expends billions of dollars pushing gold and silver lower? These events go forward as the IMF says the world economy is in trouble. We see the fed’s efforts as having a slow effect that will perhaps relieve the 3.8 million house inventory they and lenders are carrying, but it is a losing battle even at 30-year fixed mortgage rates of 3%. The 4-year foreclosure projection is for an inventory of 8 to 11.5 million foreclosed homes as the building industry adds 550,000 new homes annually. We ask what can they be thinking? The Fed has taken the wrong road for its prime vehicle. It doesn’t mean they have to abandon operation twist, but they have to have something that will act quickly to move the economy into growth. It is quite evident at the same time that they will have to purchase $850 billion to $1 trillion in Treasuries as well, plus loan more than $1 trillion to European banks and perhaps governments. The downside on the 10-year note could be at 1%. Who would buy such paper with 11.4% inflation? No one of sane mind would make such an investment. They had best do something quickly. It should not be buying mortgage bonds and collateralized mortgage debt. That only shores bank balance sheets. The Fed needs banking to prudently lend out the $2 trillion they are sitting on if small and medium sized business will borrow it and create jobs. The Fed and government have only two choices, inflate or purge the system. They had the same choice in 1990, 2000 and three years ago. We have seen 20 years of lying, manipulation and incompetence and the American public is sick of it. There is no question that lack of confidence is hurting recovery and that could change if Mr. Bernanke was replaced. Reflection of that lack of confidence is the abrupt lack of insider buying of company shares. It could be the Fed, Treasury and the “President’s Working Group on Financial Markets” have lost control. If it were not for the terrible problems in Europe the dollar would be much lower versus other currencies, gold and silver. The economy needs inflation and it is up to the Fed to supply it. If chairman Bernanke cannot supply that he will soon be leaving his post.

Part of what happens as a result of Thursday’s Bundestag vote will dictate how the ECB handles its problems pertaining to policymaking, its circumvention of rules and the holding of an enormous amount of securities and banks that are weak along with insolvent governments. In addition, they have to find a way to sell these securities. Their only hope is if Germany agrees to participate on Thursday.

In the meantime in case the Bundestag refuses behind the scenes a grand plan is being put together involving massive bank recapitalization, which would give the EFSF more power. This in part would be done by the ECB via leverage and a loss-sharing arrangement to avoid having to further submit to national congresses for approval, effectively relieving them of their sovereignty. The German people do not want this, but the CDU is pushing it in exchange for its support against intervention and a partial Greek default, which the CDU rejected two years ago. Many want the ECB leveraged, but within the legal framework of the EU Treaty and the bailout fund it cannot be leveraged. Just involving the central bank violates the EU Treaty. This past weekend the IMF meeting in Washington produced nothing. The effort to raise $3 trillion would trigger credit downgrades for all participants.

The ECB recently purchased some $55 billion of Italian and Spanish bonds in the open market, which was in breach of rules. We might ask whom will they sell them too?

There is no question bankers and central bankers are trapped and there is no way for them to painlessly extricate themselves. These are the experts that have been responsible for imprudent lending and they demand they be bailed out.

In the US the Fed has to resort to QE 3 and if they do not the system will collapse. They have to assist in creating jobs. There can be no recovery without job creation. The only way to recovery is lavish federal spending, not budget cuts, otherwise the great purge begins; already the hour is late.

What has to be indelibly printed in everyone’s minds is the self-interest of banks and bankers. Problems are not dealt with expeditiously because it is all about self-interest and survival. Jobs, the recovery and the economy are secondary. The continuation of the EU and the euro zone has to be saved at all costs by any means to bring about world government. The move toward a super-state has to be done quietly and with stealth, without the people realizing what is being done to them – eventual enslavement. Politicians who have ceased to represent their constituencies are expediting the road to serfdom. That is reflected by 70% of legislation coming from bureaucrats in Brussels. In the US it is done via payoffs.

The crisis is again in control and whether Europe can put its house in order remains to be seen.

Last week the Dow fell 6.4%, S&P 6.5%, Nasdaq fell 4.3% and the Russell 2000 8.7%, as Ben Bernanke performed his most recent magic. Banks only fell 9.5%; and broker dealers 8.8%. Cyclicals fell 11.1%, transports sank 9.6%; consumers 5.1%; utilities 1.4%; high tech 5.8%; simi’s 5.8%; Internets 6.4% and biotechs 4.1%. Gold fell $155.00, the HUI gold index fell 11.7% and the USDX rose 2.5% to 78.50.

Two-year T-bills rose 5 bps to 0.21%; 10-year T-notes 22 bps to 1.83% and the 10-year German bund fell 12 bps to a record low of 1.745%.

The Freddie Mac 30-year fixed rate mortgage was unchanged at 4.09%. The 15′s were off 1 bps TO 3.29%, one-year ARM’S rose 1 bps to 2.82% and the 3-year fixed rate jumbos fell 4 bps to 4.76%.

Fed credit fell $4.3 billion to $2.849 trillion. The yoy increases is 24.2%. Fed foreign holdings of Treasury, Agency debt fell $7.1 billion to $3.468 trillion. Custody holdings for foreign central banks are up $118 billion ytd and $255 billion yoy or up 7.9%.

M2, narrow, money supply fell $7.5 billion to $9.584 trillion, it is up 11.9% ytd and 10.3% yoy.

Total money market funds fell $11.8 billion to $2.621 trillion.

Commercial paper outstanding fell $13.4 billion to $1.030 trillion. That is a 10-week decline of $207 billion.

Jake, Sons of Liberty: Iranian Pastor Faces Execution While America Sits in Silence

Friday, September 30th, 2011

By Jake McMillian MacAulay
GCN Live.com

Pastor in Iran, held in prison for over 2 years, after son is forced to read Koran.


Youcef Nadarkhani

Iranian pastor Youcef Nadarkhani with his two sons

Youcef Nadarkhani, 32, the pastor of a 400-member Church of Iran, has been held in that country’s Gilan Province since October 2009, after he protested to local education authorities that his son was forced to read from the Koran at school.

His wife, Fatemeh Pasandideh, was also arrested in June 2010 in an apparent attempt to pressure him to renounce his faith. She was released in October 2010, according to Amnesty International.

When asked to repent, Nadarkhani stated: “Repent means to return. What should I return to? To the blasphemy that I had before my faith in Christ?”

“To the religion of your ancestors, Islam,” the judge replied, according to the American Center for Law & Justice.

“I cannot,” Nadarkhani said.

The average American would never consider that this could ever happen in our country. But why then is this event occurring in nations abroad? What makes our nation so different?

One of the main reasons is that we as Americans have government protection of our religious rights. The First Amendment to our Constitution reads “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, nor prohibiting the fee exercise thereof…” It was no accident that our founders wrote and enforced this law. To not protect and understand religious or Christian liberty, is to not understand America.

The fact is that Christianity makes man and governments more humane, and every man alive would prefer the protection, peace, and liberty of a nation comprised of Christian Laws, customs, and people.

Annex to Nadarkhani case, Assyrian evangelical pastor, Rev. Wilson Issavi, was imprisoned for 54 days for allegedly converting Muslims prior to his release in March 2010, Elam officials told Fox News. Yet a small minority in our very country would seek to supplant the bedrock (Christianity) of our liberties in this nation, liberties that would prevent this treatment of two men who seek only to honor their God and bless their fellow men.

Ponder with me for a moment America: In the name of tolerance should we become intolerant of necessary oxygen for our lungs to breathe? Does not our religious convictions compel us to something that countries like Iran cannot understand, Liberty? Thomas Jefferson asked: “Can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are of the gift of God?”

I have received many emails asking for help, prayer, and pressure on this situation to prevent a travesty. These requests and morally compelling pleas have come from Christian organizations.

Yet our president has remained silent, making America wonder what type of immorality is “unacceptable” in his value system? (Editor’s note: the White House has released a statement urging Iran to let the pastor free, but there has been no official comment from President Obama)

Rev. Jonathan Morris, a Catholic priest in the Archdiocese of New York and an analyst for Fox News Channel, said Nadarkhani’s case is “unmistakable evidence” that Iran is executing Christians simply because they refuse to become Muslims. Morris continued: “Will President Obama, and the free world allow the United Nations to continue in its cowardly silence on this matter?”

One of the greatest Prophets this nation has seen, Martin Luther King Jr., stated, “Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.”

Prevention always proves better than cure, so let us decry travesties thousands of miles away, and be wise enough to prevent the spawning grounds for such travesties among us today.

talk radio hostJake McMillian MacAulay is the co-host of Sons of Liberty talk radio show, which airs on GCN Monday-Friday 2:00-3:00pm Central Time. Listen to the show On Demand. Coming September 10th, The Sons of Liberty will be airing on Saturdays 4:00-6:00pm CT, in addition to their weekday show.

Barb Adams: He’s Back! Putin Announces Bid for Russian Presidency

Friday, September 30th, 2011

By Barb Adams
GCN Live.com

Questions regarding Medvedev’s effectiveness as president and whether Putin chose him for the position to serve his own desires to regain the presidency.


Russian President Dmitry Medvedev (left) and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin (right)

The decision by Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin to swap places may have solidified Russia’s political future for years to come, but creates questions regarding Medvedev’s effectiveness as president and whether Putin chose him for the position to serve his own desires to regain the presidency.

This past week Vladimir Putin announced he will seek a third term as president, which could possibly last until 2024. Putin’s announcement was delivered by current President Dmitry Medvedev before the United Russia party’s convention, silencing many in the crowd who had held hopes for Medvedev’s visions for a more open, democratic country. Medvedev will step aside as president and become prime minister, the position Putin currently holds.

So did Medvedev ever really have a chance to remain as president, or did Putin place him in that position only to serve his own means? In a report in The Daily Beast, Owen Matthews states that “An early indication that Medvedev had little chance of ever holding on to the presidency came last week when a liberal, business-friendly party inspired by Medvedev’s calls for a more open and less corrupt society were sabotaged by Putin loyalists. Billionaire oligarch Mikhail Prokhorov (a metals magnate and owner of the New Jersey Nets basketball team) had been handpicked by the Kremlin to lead Right Cause – a tame opposition party…which had the blessing of Medvedev and was the closest thing Russia would have to a real voice of dissent in parliamentary elections in 2012. Last Tuesday, Prokhorov was ousted from his own party, after refusing candidate lists handed down from Putin. The detonation of the Right Cause project was an early warning that Medvedev’s political traction – which had been tenuous at best – had all but slipped away.” Adding to Medvedev’s plight as president was the resignation of Russia’s popular Finance Minister, Alexei Kudrin, who resigned on Monday after a dispute with Medvedev, stating that he would not accept a position in a future government with Medvedev as head.

Before Putin became prime minister, the role had held little power; and most agree that the position will likely be demoted once Putin returns to the Kremlin and Medvedev becomes prime minister. Medvedev will likely continue on as he has all along, being nothing more than a figurehead. Even while he was president, Medvedev never really held the powers associated with the position, always being overshadowed by Putin. And perhaps that is why Putin, who was forced to relinquish his presidency in 2008 because of term limits, chose inexperienced Dmitry Medvedev of St. Petersburg as his successor, knowing that Medvedev could never challenge his political base.

Ironically, it was under Medvedev’s presidency that amendments were made to the Russian constitution allowing the presidential term to be extended to six years, opening the door for Putin’s return to the presidency.

Unfortunately, with Putin’s return to the presidency, Russia could see a return to a more corrupt authoritarian state. As Matthews points out in his article, “During his first two terms as president, Putin presided over a systematic elimination of anti-government TV channels; banned local elections and excluded genuine opposition parties from Parliament; jailed or exiled oligarchs who refused to toe the Kremlin line; appointed veterans of the KGB like himself to positions of power; and according to State Department cables published by WikiLeaks, probably sanctioned the murder of enemies of the state in London, Dubai, and Vienna. The number of state employees also increased by 50 percent…and not coincidentally, bribes and corruption rose to a third of Russia’s GDP.”

It is unfortunate that the more liberal, democratic-minded Medvedev could not have been more effective as president. In a speech given early on in his presidency, Medvedev stated, “Today, for the first time in our history we have the chance to prove to ourselves and the world that Russia can develop democratically.” Medvedev had a dream, but his dream will have to wait out those of Vladimir Putin.

talk radio hostBarb Adams is the host of Amerika Now talk radio show, which airs on GCN Saturdays 9:00p-1:00am Central Time. Listen to the show On Demand.

Jim Brown: There Are Big Bucks In College Sports! But Who’s Getting Them?

Thursday, September 29th, 2011

By Jim Brown
GCN Live.com

Jim Brown takes a look at why student athletes should receive a stipend for spending money, and what would be the result of such a system.

With TV income at an all time high, and with attendance breaking records nationwide, the college football season is off to the most successful start in its history. Football in my home state of Louisiana is the major subject of discussion as the LSU Tigers were ranked number one in the nation by the Associated Press poll for this week. But out of the euphoria and excitement, scandals seem to be breaking out at new schools weekly, with top players being accused of selling memorabilia, and taking cash from adoring fans for a little spending money. Is there something wrong with the present system?

There certainly is a rapidly growing pot of money throughout the college system. Fans pay through the nose to attend major college athletic events. As an LSU football season ticket holder, I personally pay $840 just for the right to buy my season tickets. The seat itself is $54 per game. Similar surcharges are also applied to basketball tickets. So there are big bucks coming into major college programs all over the country. Top-level college sports are big business. LSU, for example, receives some $100 million in revenue each year from ticket sales, television rights, concessions, parking, and logo sales, which is about five times what the school receives from tuition.

In a recent edition of The New York Times, conservative columnist David Brooks, who generally is on the mark with his observations, yearns for a return of what was portrayed as “the golden age of the amateur ideal.” According to Brooks, “The amateur ideal was a restraining code that emphasized fair play and honor. It held that those blessed with special gifts have a special responsibility to hew to a chivalric code. The idea was to make sport a part of the nation’s moral education.”

Well and good, as long as the athlete who is trying to pay for honor, and is also the sole producer of the huge college athletic income, can pay the bills. All this income comes from one source…the athletes. Yet these young men and women are paid only enough to cover the basic college expenses — room, food, tuition and books. No pocket money to go to the movies, no gas money, no extras whatsoever. So we have college athletic programs raking in millions on the backs of talented, disciplined, hardworking athletes, without sharing the revenue with those responsible for generating it. Such a system is ill-defined at best and hypocritical at worst. The universities, administrators, and coaches are reaping great value — even luxury — provided by their recruits, and the players, themselves, are given only a Spartan subsistence.

In this month’s Atlantic Magazine cover story, Taylor Branch writes superbly of “The Shame of College Sports.” He refers to the Knight Commission, an unsympathetic group set up by the NCAA to review possible compensation ideas for college athletes. “Scholarship athletes are already paid,” declared the skeptical Knight Commission members, “in the most meaningful way possible: with a free education.” Branch bemoans their attitude, writing that “this evasion by prominent educators severed my last reluctant, emotional tie with imposed amateurism. I found it worse than self-serving. It echoes masters who once claimed that heavenly salvation would outweigh earthly injustice to slaves. In the era when our college sports first arose, colonial powers were turning the whole world upside down to define their own interests as all-inclusive and benevolent. Just so, the NCAA calls it heinous exploitation to pay college athletes a fair portion of what they earn.”

Branch goes on to conclude that it should be a no brainer to go ahead and pay some stipend to college athletics. But like Hamlet, Brooks’ New York Times article struggles with imposing questions that trouble him. “How would you pay the athletes? Would the stars get millions while the rest get hardly nothing?” He then surmises that “The lingering vestiges of the amateur ideal are worth preserving.” So he is OK with everyone in the system profiting but the athletes. Me thinks Brooks doth protest too much. Most of the reasonable advocates of athlete compensation are talking about merely some additional spending money.

It was a little better than 40 years ago when I was lucky enough to attend the University of North Carolina on an athletic scholarship. I was given a housing and food allowance that exceeded my costs, as well as “laundry money” that allowed for weekend dates, gas, and a few frills above the basic scholarship costs. What I received then was equivalent to some $250 in pocket money if the same were allowed today.

But the NCAA tightened up the rules, and college athletes get less today than athletes like me received some years back. Most college athletes live off campus, and are given a monthly stipend for their room and board. I’m merely suggesting upping the ante and increasing this monthly amount by a couple of hundred bucks. Is that really going to corrupt the system? Or are we merely going to allow a little breathing room for an athlete to buy a few essentials and maybe fill up their car with gas. Would such a small compensation really “corrupt the world of amateur athletics” as Brooks concludes?

Supporters of the present system will argue that there is the opportunity for these athletes to move on to the pros and make big financial returns. But we all know that very few make it to that level. They may not even end up with the basic skills necessary to succeed in other workplaces, since only a minority of student-athletes in major sports even graduate. LSU football and basketball players generally graduate at a rate of less than 40%.

The system in place now allows our young college athletes to be exploited, and the exploitation is being committed by their adult mentors. What a deal — your body in exchange for a pittance of basic expenses. A little monthly expense money is not about to corrupt the system. Providing $300 a month to all athletes on full athletic scholarship seems reasonable. March Madness, as is always the case, turned out to be a financial bonanza — but not for the kids that many of us paid to watch. They deserve a better shake and a small piece of this huge financial pie.

*****

“Look I get it, there are tickets, jerseys, video games, souvenirs, and concessions being sold largely because of the players on the field. “Everyone,” so to speak, is making money except the players.
-Sports writer Donnie Blackhawk

Peace and Justice,
Jim Brown

 

talk radio hostJim Brown is the host of Jim Brown’s Common Sense talk radio show, which airs on GCN Sundays 9:00am-11:00am Central Time. Listen to the show On Demand.