Archive for October, 2010

Baby Boomers: Get Out of the Stock Market Now, the Rug is Being Pulled Out By Insiders

Thursday, October 28th, 2010

Eric Blair
Activist Post
October 28, 2010

roulette.jpg
The charade is almost up, as the bad-but-getting-even-worse main street economy is not remotely factored in to Wall Street’s casino calculations.

If you’re a baby boomer who still believes in the stock market since the financial collapse of 2008, listen up. The floor of this Ponzi scheme is about to drop out, leaving you punching a clock for some time to come and holding an empty retirement bag for your effort. The engineered crash is coming and the elite are jumping ship in droves — you should join them and get out ASAP.

Stock market insider selling has now reached record highs. The trend has been increasing for the last several years, but now the ratios are getting beyond ridiculous. Earlier this month, Zero Hedge reported that the insider selling-to-buying ratio is 2341 to 1. Tyler Durden wrote:

After last week saw an insider selling to buying ratio of 1,411 to 1, this week the ratio has nearly doubled, hitting a ridiculous 2,341 to 1. And while Wall Street’s liars and CNBC’s clowns will have you throw all your money into “leading” techs like Oracle and Google, insiders in these names sold a combined $200 million in stock in the last week alone.

Today, CNBC reported that the insider selling activity at some of the largest traded companies is at an all-time high. This can’t be a good sign of things to come. The article points to the analysis of Alan Newman, a market strategist who tracks insider trading: “The overwhelming volume of sell transactions relative to buy transactions by company insiders over the last six months in key leading sectors of the market is the worst . . . ever.” CNBC reported that industry leaders have a staggering 3177 to 1 insider sell-to-buy ratio:

The largest companies in three of the most important leading sectors of the market have seen their executives classified as insiders sell more than 120 million shares of stock over the last six months. Top executives at these very same companies bought just 38,000 shares over that same time period, making for an eye-popping sell to buy ratio of 3,177 to one.

The grand total for the three sectors are “as awful as we have ever seen since we began doing this exercise years ago,” said Newman, who was ahead on such trends as the dangers of high-frequency trading and ETFs before the ‘Flash Crash’. “Clearly, insiders are seeing great value only in cash. Their actions speak volumes for the veracity for the current rally.”

Also quoted in the CNBC piece was Simon Baker, CEO of Baker Asset Management, who said the insider data “is good reason for considerable caution once the price action fades,” and “insiders normally buy early and sell early too. Longer term — 12 months out — it is more of a red flag.”

It’s pretty difficult to excuse these levels of insider looting, but the experts are doing their best to claim that these poor executives (the titans of their industries) must take profits from stock sales because their salaries and bonuses have been cut. Who do they think they are kidding? Wall Street is still paying record salaries and bonuses, reportedly worth $144 billion (about a $1000 for every working American). There also has been very little news of other industry executives taking pay cuts, as American companies are holding record levels of cash to the tune of over a trillion dollars. In fact, the flush-with-cash CEOs continue to blame the consumer class for joblessness.

Despite the mass exodus of executives from their own company’s stock, the S&P continues to remain somewhat stable since gaining 16% from July lows. Well, those gains seem somewhat pathetic since the value of the dollar — measured against the human inflation indexes such as food and oil — has plummeted. Major food commodities are up over 50% since their July lows, while oil prices have climbed $10 to over $81/bbl, or around 14% for the same time period, with predictions to break the $100/bbl mark very shortly.

Barely covering the cost of real inflationary measures is hardly success, especially with the current risks involved with being in the stock market. These risks have only increased since the 2008 financial collapse that eventually caused the stock market to bottom out the mid-6000 range. The market has been propped up with TARP funds and driven by scandalous front-running by Goldman Sachs and other large firms leading to 70% of stock purchases to be held for an average of 11 seconds. Consequently, these robo-trading programs have also been blamed for the freak “Flash Crash” in May where the stock market plummeted over 900 points in just minutes.

The charade is almost up, as the bad-but-getting-even-worse main street economy is not remotely factored in to Wall Street’s casino calculations. Truth is, most states are approaching bankruptcy, unemployment continues to worsen, and yet another major scandal is playing out with Fraudclosure Gate. Newman, the insider trading expert, says, “At the risk of sounding like a broken record, we expect a significant correction.”

Unless you are an ultra-sophisticated trader with access to front-running software, it is time to follow these insiders out of the stock market and into real assets. As the Fed announces plans for QE2, which the stock market actually views as a good thing, the elite seem to be flocking to precious metals, commodities, and large agricultural land purchases on the expectation of an even weaker dollar. This appears to make gold, food, and oil pretty safe bets for the average bloke.

Why Rand Paul Makes Sense

Thursday, October 28th, 2010

Jay’s Analysis
October 28, 2010

Rand Paul, as many are aware, has become somewhat of a media star of late, with the majority of the mainstream attention focused on anything but the issues. We have heard ad nauseam about “Aqua Buddha,” that Dr. Paul kidnapped women in college, forcing them to smoke pot, he is a “racist,” that he is for drugging children and forcing “everyone” to pay a $2000 dollar Medicare deductible. This is all you will hear from the mainstream media, and guess what–none of it is true.

randpaul10.jpg

The “anonymous source” for the Aqua Buddha fiasco has retracted her story, but the mainstream outlets have not reported this. In fact, there was no kidnapping, and the “secret society” is a joke. When Dr. Paul was on Rachel Maddow’s show, what he responded “yes” to was whether he could hear the audio feed, not “yes” to repealing all civil rights laws. But that is not how the media has spun the incident–it’s far juicier to say he wants to appeal all civil rights.

Ironically, it is not Dr. Paul who wants to see all children “drugged,” as his opponent Jack Conway has implied, but rather Dr. Paul supports decriminalization of drugs solely for the purpose of decreasing out massive prison population. The U.S. has the largest prison population in the world, and most are there for non-violent offenses. To reduce the massive prison complex would cut taxes, as well as create new jobs (since inmates are cheap labor). In fact, as has just recently surfaced, according to the Louisville Courier Journal’s article of October 23rd “LMPD Probes Detectives Who Tipped Off Prosecutor Under Investigation,” it is now Jack Conway and his brother who are embroiled in a possible absconding of a drug investigation. So it appears that in terms of drugs, Conway has more to explain that Rand. In regards to the Medicare, what Rand actually said was that seniors over a certain age might have to pay a deductible if we want to continue the system, since it is not working.

Now that we have cleared away the smoke and mirrors of the mainstream liberal establishment, it’s crucial to consider that students might be tempted to think Dr. Paul is just a mainline neo-conservative. This is also not true. Dr. Paul, like his extremely popular father, Dr. Ron Paul, has as his main agenda balancing the budget and the private Federal Reserve banking system. The Federal Reserve is a private institution that prints fiat money and controls our monetary system, as well as our government.

It is Conway who supported banker bailouts and cap and trade–two massively unpopular and now exposed scams that the Pauls both opposed. What has propped up this system? The answer is career politicians who have no term limits. Term limits is the other key platform of Dr. Paul, and Rand has pledged to work towards this goal. The other proof of Rand Paul’s unique perspective, and that he is not a mainline Republican is that he has been opposed by Dick Cheney and Trey Grayson–two key neo-con figures.

President Barack Obama has reached new lows in terms of presidential approval ratings for the amount of time he has been in office. Jack Conway represents a continuation of the highly unpopular Obamacare and bailout policies of the mainline left. However, what we find is that it is the Pauls who are the true populists, and who are committed to addressing and fixing the central issue that is the means to the end of our republic–that of the debt-based, inflationary system known as the Federal Reserve. Conway has no such plans. Dr. Rand Paul is a physician, and not a career politician. I would urge students to examine the issue, looking past the hype and media gossip and examine the issues. In so doing, I trust intelligent students will see that Rand Paul is the only choice that makes sense for our future, as opposed to establishment status quo Obamanomics.

Jack Conway Takes Money from Criminal Drug Company

Thursday, October 28th, 2010

Kurt Nimmo
GCN Live.com
October 28, 2010

The more you look at Jack Conway, the worse it gets. Yesterday we reported on Conway’s effort to obstruct justice in a criminal drug investigation of his brother. Today we report that Jack Conway accepts money from a company that pushes a dangerous drug, OxyContin.

The NADDI, the National Association of Drug Diversion Investigators, dropped a $50,000 check on Kentucky and its Attorney General Jack Conway.

On October 25, Marianne Skolek, writing for the Salem-News, reported on Conway’s connection to Purdue Pharma, a Stamford, Connecticut, pharmaceutical company that manufactures the highly addictive opioid analgesic, OxyContin. According to Skolek, the “state of Kentucky was suing Purdue Pharma for the devastation caused by OxyContin in deaths and addictions — and since Purdue Pharma was criminally convicted in Federal Court in 2007 of deceiving physicians and patients about the addictive and abusive qualities of OxyContin, I had a problem with law enforcement being associated with Purdue Pharma’s poster child, NADDI.”

NADDI’s stated purpose is that it “facilitates cooperation between law enforcement, healthcare professionals, state regulatory agencies and pharmaceutical manufacturers in the prevention and investigation of prescription drug diversion,” according to its website.

Conway told Marianne Skolek he will continue to take “this money and put it to good use to help in the fight against drugs and crime.”

“Abuse of prescription drugs is a serious problem in the state of Kentucky,” notes a website critical of Conway. “Jack Conway claims to be ‘tough on drugs’ but in reality, he broke an important campaign promise to create a drug task force upon entering office. Additionally, he took $50,000 from the very drug company that creates OxyContin. Does Jack Conway stand with the drug companies and their deep pockets, or with the people of Kentucky who must deal with the rampant problems with crime and abuse?”

Conway demonstrated his hypocrisy when he criticized opponent Rand Paul for opposing Kentucky’s policy of taking federal money in the so-called war on drugs. Paul told a group of county officials gathered in Louisville this summer that he would “rather see drug abuse and dependency treated and paid for at the local level” than by the federal government.

In response, Conway released the following television ad:

It looks like Jack Conway is soft of drugs, not Rand Paul. He takes money from a company convicted of deceiving physicians and patients about the addictive and abusive qualities of OxyContin.

NPR’s firing of Juan Williams Further Proof of Political Correctness Run Amok

Thursday, October 28th, 2010

By Rachael Woodhouse
GCN Live.com

The firing of Juan Williams by National Public Radio has left the news/talk industry abuzz. Robert “Rob” Redding Jr., host of GCN’s Redding News Review and a journalist himself, weighed in on the shocking news on Thursday’s broadcast. His take? That the muzzling of journalists’ voices for stepping out of politically-correct bounds runs counter to the proper way journalism is supposed to function in a truly free society.

Ralph Cooper is a former producer for Williams’ new pieces on Morning Edition. Redding invited former Cooper onto the program to offer his insight into the long-strained relationship between Williams and his long-term employer, NPR.

Juan Williams: caught in the middle of the culture war between NPR and Fox.


“I think that there’s some more going on here,” said Redding. “I don’t think that there’s a coincidence on, first of all, Fox news, because they didn’t like him going on Fox news in the first place.”

Cooper agreed. “There’s more to this – has to be more to this – than his statements on Fox, because even after watching the video, even after reading all the articles, in reality what he said wasn’t that bad.”

Cooper placed Williams’ comments squarely in the realm of typical public discourse as it relates to xenophobia. “Before people were afraid of Muslims getting on planes, they were afraid of black people. I’ve been taking off my shoes getting on planes since I was 13 years old. So, when it changed around and everybody said ‘I can’t believe this; this is such an injustice’, I’m used to this.”

“Now, I know for a fact that when Juan accepted the position at Fox, they [NPR] took him down from being a correspondent to being just like an analyst.”

“Exactly,” Redding agreed, “because they didn’t want him to really affiliate with Fox because it would legitimize the network. And let’s face it – NPR trends more liberal and left.”

Redding placed the entire Williams incident in perspective by drawing analogies to two other recent high-profile media incidents that have drawn a question mark over the role and rights of journalists in America’s tense political climate. The first is the recent firing of veteran CNN newsman Rick Sanchez over comments construed to be anti-Semitic; the second being a recent meeting between President Obama and members of the Black press corps in which the members of the press lavished Obama with nothing but applause, asking no hard questions.

“These kind of instances seem like they’re continuing to become issues,” Redding pointed out. “What do you think is the future role of an analyst/commentator/news anchor at this point? Do you think that we’re going to see more of these [incidents]?”

Cooper’s answer painted a bleak future for the role of journalism in America: “It’s bad itself, to speak extremely freely, that during the Bush era that you just couldn’t speak. You couldn’t talk. Political correctness took over everything. It took over the news rooms, it took over everything. Now, we’ve moved to a whole new place where Black people are being accused of being racist towards white people. Latino people are being accused of being racist towards Muslim people. The way it stands right now, nobody’s going to be able to say anything about anybody because you’re going to offend everybody. Then, nobody’s going to have a job and everybody’s going to be blogging.”

Big Berkey Gravity-Fed Water Filters Are a Top Pick For Clean Water and Long-Term Preparedness

Thursday, October 28th, 2010

by Mike Adams
NaturalNews.com

The water filtration market is saturated with products that claim to provide clean drinking water. While all of them work to one degree or another, some can be complicated to install and maintain. And some are downright expensive on a per-gallon basis, too. The more popular faucet filters, for example, only filter a hundred gallons of water (or so) before requiring replacement. Personally, I like to have water filters that can handle several thousand gallons of water at a very low effective cost per gallon.

The "Big Berkey System" model is made out of durable stainless steel.


I also like gravity-fed water filters for several important reasons: They require no electricity to use — meaning they’ll work even when the lights go out — and there are no complicated motors or pumps to wear out or replace. They’re also light and fairly portable, making them a natural choice for anyone interested in short-term storm preparedness or even long-term “end of the world” preparedness scenarios.

I’ve used several gravity-fed water filters, and I’ve come to really like the Big Berkey system the best. As far as simple, reliable water purification on your countertop, it doesn’t get any better than Berkey water systems.

How the Big Berkey works

With a Berkey water filter, you simply put the water into the top chamber and gravity pulls it through the media filters that capture bacteria, parasites, herbicides, pesticides, solvents, nitrates, nitrites, lead, mercury, chlorine, VOCs, and even fluoride. You can run practically any type of water through the unit and get fresh, pure drinking water as a result. (Of course, really dirty water will clog the filters more quickly, requiring more frequent cleaning of the filters, but that’s true with any filtration system.)

Imagine the security and peace of mind of having clean water anywhere...

I personally use the “Big Berkey System” which is made out of stainless steel, and I love it! I used it for many months in Ecuador without a single problem, and it is still a personal favorite that I highly recommend. The water always comes out clean, no matter how dirty it is when you initially pour it into the holding container at the top.

My favorite feature on the Big Berkey System is the stainless steel water container. Many other brands of water filters are made out of polycarbonate and plastic components that may leach harmful chemicals into the water (Berkey does sell a co-polyester variety, but guarantees that it’s BPA free). Another cool feature of the system is that it requires no pumps or effort to function. Gravity literally does all the work for you. Yes, it takes some time for the gravity filter to produce water, but by filling the top container, the effective water pressure provided by gravity is more than enough to produce sufficient drinking water each day for a typical family.

The stainless steel aspect of the Berkey water filters is also a huge plus. I’ve used other hand-held filters that ran the water through a hose, and it seems like the water always comes out tasting a bit like the hose. But with the Big Berkey, there’s no “hose” taste because there’s no hose! The water tastes clean and clear, with no “surgical” aftertaste.

If you don’t already have a gravity-powered water filter, I recommend one for every household that’s interested in preparedness. As long as you have access to some source of water, this water filter can get you through a storm, a blackout or even a period of social unrest. When the municipal plumbing fails, Big Berkey keeps you hydrated with clean, bacteria-free water.

That’s worth its weight in gold, in my opinion.

Where to get Big Berkey water filters

Here’s the source for Big Berkey water filters that I’m familiar with and recommend. You’ll get excellent customer service with these folks along with very competitive pricing, too:

directive21.com

(They also carry some other large-scale water storage devices such as the Aquatank.)

Got a family member who doesn’t believe in preparedness? Give them a Big Berkey and call it a Christmas present. One day when they need it, they’ll realize you actually gave them the gift of clean water during an emergency, and that’s perhaps one of the best gifts you can ever give anyone.